These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7426116)

  • 1. Improving grant applications for research in communicative disorders.
    Hanson DG; Ulvestad RF; Ranney JB
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1980; 89(3 Pt 1):257-61. PubMed ID: 7426116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in program project grant funding at the National Cancer Institute.
    Broder S; Cushing M
    Cancer Res; 1993 Feb; 53(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 8425180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
    Kotchen TA; Lindquist T; Malik K; Ehrenfeld E
    JAMA; 2004 Feb; 291(7):836-43. PubMed ID: 14970062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH peer review of grant applications. Definitions, procedures, and suggestions.
    Wingate CL
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Apr; 28 Suppl 2():S38-40. PubMed ID: 8478186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of the National Cancer Act on grant support.
    Kalberer JT
    Cancer Res; 1975 Mar; 35(3):472-81. PubMed ID: 1090361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scholarly investigation into otitis media: who is receiving funding support from the National Institutes of Health?
    Hojjat H; Johnson AP; Svider PF; Hong RS; Zuliani G; Folbe AJ; Shkoukani MA
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Jul; 125(7):1708-14. PubMed ID: 25684148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The peer review process: how to prepare research grant applications to the NIH.
    Novello AC
    Miner Electrolyte Metab; 1985; 11(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 4047004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Secrets of successful short grant applications.
    Groves PS; Rawl SM; Wurzbach ME; Fahrenwald N; Cohen MZ; McCarthy Beckett DO; Zerwic J; Given B; Algase DL; Alexander GL; Conn V
    West J Nurs Res; 2012 Feb; 34(1):6-23. PubMed ID: 21613655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Funding for urolithiasis research: progress and strategies for future NIH support.
    Bain RL; Nyberg LM
    J Endourol; 1995 Aug; 9(4):299-300. PubMed ID: 8535455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Racial inequity in grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health.
    Taffe MA; Gilpin NW
    Elife; 2021 Jan; 10():. PubMed ID: 33459595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomedical research funding: when the game gets tough, winners start to play.
    Ascoli GA
    Bioessays; 2007 Sep; 29(9):933-6. PubMed ID: 17688241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grant length and budget stability at the National Institutes of Health.
    Kalberer JT
    Science; 1981 Feb; 211(4483):675-80. PubMed ID: 7455705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 3: review by an advisory board/council.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2335-8. PubMed ID: 892000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use and importance of the NIH noncompeting continuation application.
    Gordon SL; Watson DM
    FASEB J; 1990 May; 4(8):2438-40. PubMed ID: 2335271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Report from the National Institute on Aging: the research grant support mechanism.
    Murphy DG
    J Gerontol; 1976 Nov; 31(6):696-704. PubMed ID: 977929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science and agriculture policy at Land-Grant Institutions.
    Westendorf ML; Zimbelman RG; Pray CE
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Jun; 73(6):1628-38. PubMed ID: 7673056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demystifying the NIH grant application process.
    Berg KM; Gill TM; Brown AF; Zerzan J; Elmore JG; Wilson IB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Nov; 22(11):1587-95. PubMed ID: 17687616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.