These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 742661)

  • 1. Identification of words and letters within words.
    Johnson NF; Marmurek HH
    Am J Psychol; 1978 Sep; 91(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 742661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parallel allocation of attention prior to the execution of saccade sequences.
    Godijn R; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):882-96. PubMed ID: 14585012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint.
    Grainger J; Granier JP; Farioli F; Van Assche E; van Heuven WJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):865-84. PubMed ID: 16846285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition?
    Davis CJ; Bowers JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):923-41. PubMed ID: 15462631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
    Stolz JA; Stevanovski B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct assessments of the processing time hypothesis for the missing-letter effect.
    Saint-Aubin J; Klein RM; Roy-Charland A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1191-210. PubMed ID: 14640838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cohort model of visual word recognition.
    Johnson NF; Pugh KR
    Cogn Psychol; 1994 Jun; 26(3):240-346. PubMed ID: 8033536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The role of external letter positions in visual word recognition].
    Perea M; Lupker SJ
    Psicothema; 2007 Nov; 19(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 17959107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.
    Peterzell DH; Sinclair GP; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 2221192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects.
    Myung JY; Blumstein SE; Sedivy JC
    Cognition; 2006 Jan; 98(3):223-43. PubMed ID: 16399263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnocellular involvement in flanked-letter identification relates to the allocation of attention.
    Omtzigt D; Hendriks AW
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(16):1927-40. PubMed ID: 15145686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter identification in words and non-words, with variation in visual angle and delay of position cue.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1982; 11(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 7167339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target letter inclusion in single and multiple word substrings and identification accuracy.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1988 Apr; 115(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3385413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.
    LaBerge D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Jun; 9(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 6223977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.