These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7427726)

  • 1. Right hemisphere comprehension of verbs in patients with complete forebrain commissurotomy: use of the dichotic method and manual performance.
    Gordon HW
    Brain Lang; 1980 Sep; 11(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 7427726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The problem of interhemispheric relations.
    Mosidze VM; Turashvili RI; Akbardiya KK
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 1978; 9(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 748821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plasticity in speech organization following commissurotomy.
    Gazzaniga MS; Volpe BT; Smylie CS; Wilson DH; LeDoux JE
    Brain; 1979 Dec; 102(4):805-15. PubMed ID: 116711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The relationship of the right hemisphere in voice recognition].
    Thuillard F; Assal G
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1983 Apr; 103(4):311-3. PubMed ID: 6878961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motor and cognitive interactions during lateralized cerebral functions in children: an EEG study.
    Ruoff P; Doerr H; Fuller P; Martin D; Ruoff LO
    Cortex; 1981 Apr; 17(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 7273803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonological encoding and ideographic reading by the disconnected right hemisphere: two case studies.
    Zaidel E; Peters AM
    Brain Lang; 1981 Nov; 14(2):205-34. PubMed ID: 7306782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dichotic listening in commissurotomized and hemispherectomized subjects.
    Corballis MC; Ogden JA
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(4):565-73. PubMed ID: 3405401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Models of hemispheric specialization.
    Allen M
    Psychol Bull; 1983 Jan; 93(1):73-104. PubMed ID: 6828603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explanation in apraxia with consequences for the concept of apraxia of speech.
    Buckingham HW
    Brain Lang; 1979 Sep; 8(2):202-26. PubMed ID: 487070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vocal and manual reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time.
    Bashore TR
    Psychol Bull; 1981 Mar; 89(2):352-68. PubMed ID: 6262848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance by split-brain humans on lateralized vigilance tasks.
    Dimond SJ
    Cortex; 1979 Mar; 15(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 446044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intercentral and phase relations of brain potentials in children aged 6 and 7 years during direct and verbal stimulation.
    Obidina TG; Gershkovich NYa
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 1982; 12(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 7162615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Right hemisphere dominance for praxis and left hemisphere dominance for speech in a left-hander.
    Margolin DI
    Neuropsychologia; 1980; 18(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 7465034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competition within the left hemisphere between speaking and unimanual tasks performed without visual guidance.
    Lomas J
    Neuropsychologia; 1980; 18(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 7383306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance asymmetries in dichotic listening: the role of structural and attentional mechanisms.
    Tweedy JR; Rinn WE; Springer SP
    Neuropsychologia; 1980; 18(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 7413066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right hemisphere EEG sensitivity to speech.
    Segalowitz SJ; Cohen H
    Brain Lang; 1989 Aug; 37(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 2765856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reading comprehension performance and laterality: evidence for concurrent validity of dichotic, dichhaptic and EEG laterality measures.
    Kraft RH; Hsia TC; Roberts T; Hallum A
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(5):817-27. PubMed ID: 3431676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric interaction in the processing of concurrent tasks in commissurotomy subjects.
    Franco L
    Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(4-5):707-10. PubMed ID: 896028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The hopping response after two-stage cortical ablation in young and adult rabbits.
    Hobbelen JF; Gramsbergen A; Van Hof MW
    Behav Brain Res; 1988 Nov; 31(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 3228479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The significance of laterality effects.
    Warrington EK; Pratt RT
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1981 Mar; 44(3):193-6. PubMed ID: 7229640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.