BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7428359)

  • 1. Selected events following insertion of the Progestasert system.
    Gibor Y; Mitchell C
    Contraception; 1980 May; 21(5):491-503. PubMed ID: 7428359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Steroid intra-uterine contraception: progesterone-releasing devices. II. Insertion, clinical problems and contraceptive dependability].
    Custo GM; Cosmi EV
    Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1984; 12(4):331-43. PubMed ID: 12340352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A collaborative study of the progesterone intrauterine device (Progestasert). The World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Implantation.
    Newton J; Szontagh F; Lebech P; Rowe P
    Contraception; 1979 Jun; 19(6):575-89. PubMed ID: 487808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can intrauterine device removals for bleeding or pain be predicted at a one-month follow-up visit? A multivariate analysis.
    Stanback J; Grimes D
    Contraception; 1998 Dec; 58(6):357-60. PubMed ID: 10095972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of the effect of the Progestasert TM and Gravigard IUDs on dysmenorrhoea.
    Pizarro E; Gomez-Rogers C; Rowe PJ
    Contraception; 1979 Nov; 20(5):455-66. PubMed ID: 527341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of a progesterone-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device on endometrial blood vessels: a morphometric study.
    Shaw ST; Macaulay LK; Aznar R; González-Angulo A; Roy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Dec; 141(7):821-7. PubMed ID: 7315908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical experience with the uterine progesterone system (Progestasert R).
    Zador G; Nilsson BA; Nilsson B; Sjöberg NO; Weström L; Wiese J
    Contraception; 1976 May; 13(5):559-69. PubMed ID: 1261259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postpartum IUDS: keys for success.
    O'Hanley K; Huber DH
    Contraception; 1992 Apr; 45(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 1516367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary report on a postpartum CuT 200 study, Santiago, Chile.
    Lavin P; Waszak C; Bravo C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1983 Feb; 21(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 6133798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between two IUDs: Progestasert and CuT 200.
    Larsen S; Hansen MK; Jacobsen JC; Ladehoff P; Sorensen T; Westergaard JG
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Oct; 2(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 12336988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The Progestasert system].
    Mall-Haefeli M
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1978; 18(3-4):253-62. PubMed ID: 569628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Five years private practice experience of nulliparous women using copper IUD's.
    Smith RP; Goresky DM; Etchell DM
    Contraception; 1980 Apr; 21(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 7389354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of the Progestasert on the menstrual pattern, ovarian steroids and endometrium.
    Wan LS; Hsu YC; Ganguly M; Bigelow B
    Contraception; 1977 Oct; 16(4):417-34. PubMed ID: 923252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experience with two different medicated intrauterine devices: a comparative study of the Progestasert and Nova-T.
    Fylling P; Fagerhol M
    Fertil Steril; 1979 Feb; 31(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 761675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
    Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.
    Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE
    Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Contraception with the intrauterine pessary Progestasert].
    Schweppe KW; Tenhaeff D; Rache D
    Fortschr Med; 1978 Sep; 96(33):1685-90. PubMed ID: 700553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
    Chi IC
    Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs), versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
    French R; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Guillebaud J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD001776. PubMed ID: 11406007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.