These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7430335)
21. [Comparative antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime, cefuroxime and cefaclor against strict anaerobic bacteria]. Dubreuil L; Derriennic M; Sedallian A Pathol Biol (Paris); 1990 May; 38(5):343-6. PubMed ID: 2367150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The antibacterial efficacy of cefaclor in routine testing of clinical material from two Berlin hospitals (author's transl)]. Wagner J; Hahn H Infection; 1979; 7 Suppl 6():547-50. PubMed ID: 121730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [In vitro activity of cefaclor against Haemophilus influenzae in comparison to various oral chemotherapeutic agents (author's transl)]. Braveny I Infection; 1979; 7 Suppl 6():532-9. PubMed ID: 317812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of cefaclor. Derry JE Am J Hosp Pharm; 1981 Jan; 38(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 7011003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of the activity in vitro of different cephalosporins: cephalothin, cephradine, cephacetrile, cefaclor, cefuroxime and cefotaxime. Bianchi P; Frongillo RF Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1980 Jan; 58(6):488-95. PubMed ID: 6255966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laboratory and clinical studies of cefaclor in Japan. Fujii R Postgrad Med J; 1979; 55 Suppl 4():88-92. PubMed ID: 398486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparison of the activity of cefaclor with amoxicillin, erythromycin and doxycycline in an in vitro model]. Wiedemann B Arzneimittelforschung; 1983; 33(9):1232-5. PubMed ID: 6357205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Subinhibitory activity of cefaclor and cephalexin (author's transl)]. Shah PM; Staszewski S Infection; 1979; 7 Suppl 6():543-6. PubMed ID: 399246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of amoxycillin and cefaclor on the colonization resistance of oropharynx. van Saene HK; Willems FT; Zweens J Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1983; 39():97-9. PubMed ID: 6359384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of drug sensitivity testing with microdilution quantitative minimum inhibitory concentration and the Autobac I system. Jacob CV; Kleineman J J Clin Microbiol; 1980 May; 11(5):465-9. PubMed ID: 7381010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of in vitro antibacterial activity of four oral cephems: cephalexin, cefaclor, cefatrizine and cefadroxil. Luh KT; Chao HP; Ho SW; Hsieh WC Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1984 Feb; 17(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 6378550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to cefaclor and cephalothin: laboratory and clinical studies. Gray BM; Hubbell CA; Dillon HC Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Jun; 13(6):988-91. PubMed ID: 677865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The antibacterial efficacy of cefaclor against bacteria resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline and co-trimoxazole (author's transl)]. Machka K Infection; 1979; 7 Suppl 6():536-9. PubMed ID: 399244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]