These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7430858)

  • 1. The influence of electrode placement in the reconstruction and analysis of body surface potential maps from limited thoracic arrays.
    Horan LG; Hand RC; Flowers NC; Johnson JC; Sridharan MR
    J Electrocardiol; 1980 Oct; 13(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 7430858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpolation of body surface potential maps.
    Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; Kornreich F; van Bemmel JH
    J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():104-9. PubMed ID: 8656096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Body surface potential mapping of ST segment changes in acute myocardial infarction. Implications for ECG enrollment criteria for thrombolytic therapy.
    Kornreich F; Montague TJ; Rautaharju PM
    Circulation; 1993 Mar; 87(3):773-82. PubMed ID: 8443898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinically practical lead systems for improved electrocardiography: comparison with precordial grids and conventional lead systems.
    Lux RL; Burgess MJ; Wyatt RF; Evans AK; Vincent GM; Abildskov JA
    Circulation; 1979 Feb; 59(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 759003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Body surface distributions of repolarization potentials after acute myocardial infarction. II. Relationship between isopotential mapping and ST-segment potential summation methods.
    Mirvis DM
    Circulation; 1981 Mar; 63(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 7460248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model study of the sensitivity of body surface potential distribution to variations of electrode placement.
    Turzová M; Tysler M; Kneppo P
    J Electrocardiol; 1994 Jul; 27(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 7930989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of first acute Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction by multivariate analysis of body surface potential maps.
    Kornreich F; Montague TJ; Rautaharju PM
    Circulation; 1991 Dec; 84(6):2442-53. PubMed ID: 1835677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnosis of old inferior myocardial infarction by body surface isopotential mapping.
    Vincent GM; Abildskov JA; Burgess MJ; Millar K; Lux RL; Wyatt RF
    Am J Cardiol; 1977 Apr; 39(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 848435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal lead subsets for reconstruction of QRS and ST-T in 35-lead precordial maps.
    McManus CD; Berson AS; Rios JC; Lopez EA; Pipberger HV
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Apr; 61(11):885-90. PubMed ID: 3354464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A single ECG lead in the serial monitoring of ischemic injury and necrosis in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction: comparison with 49-lead precordial maps and standard ECGs.
    Madias JE
    J Electrocardiol; 1988 Aug; 21(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 3171458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of electrode placement errors in the EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiogram.
    Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Nelwan SP; Bond RR; Donnelly MP; Guldenring D
    J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 20832814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fine detail in body surface potential maps: accuracy of maps using a limited lead array and spatial and temporal data representation.
    Green LS; Lux RL; Stilli D; Haws CW; Taccardi B
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Jan; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3559438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Body surface potential maps in old inferior myocardial infarction. Assessment of diagnostic criteria.
    De Ambroggi L; Bertoni T; Rabbia C; Landolina M
    J Electrocardiol; 1986 Jul; 19(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 3746149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Localization of infarction of the anterior and inferior myocardial wall by body surface mapping].
    Górnicki M; Jagielski J; Swiderska-Błońska T
    Pol Arch Med Wewn; 1992; 88(2-3):90-102. PubMed ID: 1492030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How many electrodes and where? A "poldermodel" for electrocardiography.
    Kors JA; van Herpen G
    J Electrocardiol; 2002; 35 Suppl():7-12. PubMed ID: 12539094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrocardiographic markers of ischemia during mental stress testing in postinfarction patients. Role of body surface mapping.
    Bosimini E; Galli M; Guagliumi G; Giubbini R; Tavazzi L
    Circulation; 1991 Apr; 83(4 Suppl):II115-27. PubMed ID: 1826236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precordial ST-segment mapping 5. Analysis of maps and standard electrocardiograms in patients with inferior myocardial infarction.
    Madias JE
    J Electrocardiol; 1978 Oct; 11(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 712287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of serial 49-lead precordial ECG maps and standard 6-lead precordial ECGs in patients with acute anterior Q wave myocardial infarction.
    Madias JE
    J Electrocardiol; 1989 Apr; 22(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 2708928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical interpretation of body surface potential maps; aspects of adequate group representation and parameter selection.
    Kozmann G
    Pol Arch Med Wewn; 1992; 88(2-3):141-5. PubMed ID: 1492019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ST isopotential precordial surface maps in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Murray RG; Peshock RM; Parkey RW; Bonte FJ; Willerson JT; Blomqvist CG
    J Electrocardiol; 1979 Jan; 12(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 422919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.