141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7430969)
1. Status of spatial location in auditory sensory memory: evidence from rapidly presented lists.
Odgers RP; Colle HA
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Sep; 6(5):546-57. PubMed ID: 7430969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual processing in dichotic listening.
Massaro DW
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 May; 2(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 1225941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of auditory features in memory span for words.
Drewnowski A; Murdock BB
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 May; 6(3):319-32. PubMed ID: 7373250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory location in the irrelevant sound effect: The effects of presenting auditory stimuli to either the left ear, right ear or both ears.
Hadlington L; Bridges AM; Darby RJ
Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):545-57. PubMed ID: 15223201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.
Huang ST; Glenberg AM
Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 3812815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial location is accurately tracked by human auditory sensory memory: evidence from the mismatch negativity.
Deouell LY; Parnes A; Pickard N; Knight RT
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 24(5):1488-94. PubMed ID: 16987229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage.
Frankish C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):469-479. PubMed ID: 2524546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interference effects in the memory for serially presented locations in Clark's nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana.
Lewis JL; Kamil AC
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 17044743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: a study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory.
Parmentier FB; Maybery MT; Elsley J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 20139445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blocking of stimuli and the free recall and subjective organization of EMR adolescents.
Glidden LM
Am J Ment Defic; 1976 Jul; 81(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 941934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect.
Crowder RG
Psychol Rev; 1978 Nov; 85(6):502-24. PubMed ID: 734019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of age on auditory spatial attention in conditions of real and simulated spatial separation.
Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1294-305. PubMed ID: 18681615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for dissociation of spatial and nonspatial auditory information processing.
Anourova I; Nikouline VV; Ilmoniemi RJ; Hotta J; Aronen HJ; Carlson S
Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1268-77. PubMed ID: 11707083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Release from interference in auditory working memory for pitch.
Ries DT; DiGiovanni JJ
Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 230(1-2):64-72. PubMed ID: 17574355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of interaural level and phase cues on intervening interference in auditory working memory for loudness.
Jump RL; Ries DT
Hear Res; 2008 Jun; 240(1-2):112-5. PubMed ID: 18514450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large auditory and small visual effects in the recall of consonant letters.
Locke JL
Am J Psychol; 1978 Mar; 91(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 665869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Working-memory and auditory localization: demand for central resources impairs performance.
Merat N; Groeger JA
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):531-49. PubMed ID: 12745846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
