141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7430969)
21. Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.
Klatzky RL; Lippa Y; Loomis JM; Golledge RG
Learn Mem; 2002; 9(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 12464695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Spatial imagery preserves temporal order.
Watson ME; Rubin DC
Memory; 1996 Sep; 4(5):515-34. PubMed ID: 8884744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store?
Jones DM; Macken WJ; Nicholls AP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):656-74. PubMed ID: 15099134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Modalities of memory: is reading lips like hearing voices?
Maidment DW; Macken B; Jones DM
Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):471-93. PubMed ID: 24041834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Serial memory for sound-specified locations: effects of spatial uncertainty and motor suppression.
Groeger JA; Banks AP; Simpson PJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):248-62. PubMed ID: 17853218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Memory for events and their spatial context: models and experiments.
Burgess N; Becker S; King JA; O'Keefe J
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2001 Sep; 356(1413):1493-503. PubMed ID: 11571039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Disruption of auditory spatial working memory by inactivation of the forebrain archistriatum in barn owls.
Knudsen EI; Knudsen PF
Nature; 1996 Oct; 383(6599):428-31. PubMed ID: 8837773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cortical oscillatory activity during spatial echoic memory.
Kaiser J; Walker F; Leiberg S; Lutzenberger W
Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Jan; 21(2):587-90. PubMed ID: 15673459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing.
Jones DM; Macken WJ
Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 7731364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists.
Hanley JR; Shah N
Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 22497740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
Hughes RW; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dissociable functional cortical topographies for working memory maintenance of voice identity and location.
Rämä P; Poremba A; Sala JB; Yee L; Malloy M; Mishkin M; Courtney SM
Cereb Cortex; 2004 Jul; 14(7):768-80. PubMed ID: 15084491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Auditory peripersonal space in humans.
Farnè A; Làdavas E
J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1030-43. PubMed ID: 12419126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Equivalent effects of grouping by time, voice, and location on response timing in verbal serial memory.
Parmentier FB; Maybery MT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1349-55. PubMed ID: 18980399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds.
Gregg MK; Samuel AG
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):974-91. PubMed ID: 18665739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Visual localization of sounds.
Bolognini N; Rasi F; Làdavas E
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(11):1655-61. PubMed ID: 16009247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transient auditory storage of acoustic details is associated with release of speech from informational masking in reverberant conditions.
Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Wu X; Li L
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1618-28. PubMed ID: 19803660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prefrontal cortex or basolateral amygdala lesions blocked the stress-induced inversion of serial memory retrieval pattern in mice.
Chauveau F; Piérard C; Coutan M; Drouet I; Liscia P; Béracochéa D
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2008 Sep; 90(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 18572424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An alternative interpretation of the stimulus suffix effect.
Parkinson SR
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1978 Jul; 4(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 670906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
