These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7431255)
1. Data analysis I. Some statistical tests for small related samples. Pethybridge RJ J R Nav Med Serv; 1980; 66(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 7431255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4). Kalso E; Edwards J; McQuay HJ; Moore RA Eur J Pain; 2002; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11888232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [2 nonparametric statistical tests for small-size samples]. Biebler KE; Jäger B; Voss C Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1986; 80(4):175-7. PubMed ID: 3716471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Proceedings of the University of Pennsylvania annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: statistical issues in developing targeted therapies. Forward. Ellenberg JH; Ellenberg SS Clin Trials; 2010 Oct; 7(5):513-5. PubMed ID: 20861200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining several ordinal measures in clinical studies. Wittkowski KM; Lee E; Nussbaum R; Chamian FN; Krueger JG Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1579-92. PubMed ID: 15122738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concerns with analysis of correlated eye data. Gilger BC Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 14(3):214. PubMed ID: 21521448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Approximately optimal one-parameter boundaries for group sequential trials. Wang SK; Tsiatis AA Biometrics; 1987 Mar; 43(1):193-9. PubMed ID: 3567304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subgroup analyses in clinical trials. Kent D; Hayward R N Engl J Med; 2008 Mar; 358(11):1199; author reply 1199-200. PubMed ID: 18340666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dependence, hyper-dependence and hypothesis testing in clinical trials. Moyé LA; Baraniuk S Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jan; 28(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16857430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statisticians and pharmacokineticists: what they can still learn from each other. Senn S Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Sep; 88(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 20613721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential boundaries approach in clinical trials with unequal allocation ratios. Jafari P; Ayatollahi SM; Behboodian J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 16412232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and analysis of prostate cancer trials. Sylvester R Acta Urol Belg; 1994 Apr; 62(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8197926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subgroup analyses in clinical trials. Proestel S N Engl J Med; 2008 Mar; 358(11):1199; author reply 1199-200. PubMed ID: 18337613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Low p-values are not all!]. Lindberg G Lakartidningen; 2002 Oct; 99(40):3979; author reply 3979. PubMed ID: 12422764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the impact of ICH E9. Brown D; Day S; Hemmings R; Wright D Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 18438957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]