These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7433005)
1. Size constancy does not fail below half a degree. Day RH; Stuart GW; Dickinson RG Percept Psychophys; 1980 Sep; 28(3):263-5. PubMed ID: 7433005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A method to assess the relative contribution of lateral inhibition to the magnitude of visual-geometric illusions. Coren S; Porac C; Aks DJ; Morikawa K Percept Psychophys; 1988 Jun; 43(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 3399353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceived size of letters depends on inter-letter spacing: a new visual illusion. Skottun BC; Freeman RD Vision Res; 1983; 23(1):111-2. PubMed ID: 6868375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The impossibly twisted Pulfrich pendulum. Wilson JA; Robinson JO Perception; 1986; 15(4):503-4. PubMed ID: 3822737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Optical illusions--size constancy and perspective: the Beuchet chair--or tongue piercing]. Lingelbach B Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Feb; 225(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 18380060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retinal projection or size constancy as determinants of the horizontal-vertical illusion? von Collani G Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Oct; 61(2):547-57. PubMed ID: 4069920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions. Morgan MJ; Hole GJ; Glennerster A Vision Res; 1990; 30(11):1793-810. PubMed ID: 2288091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The perceived size of targets in the peripheral and central visual fields. Bedell HE; Johnson CA Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1984; 4(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 6728473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Two kinds of apparent size distortion in the Ponzo illusion (author's transl)]. Yamagami A Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1978 Dec; 49(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 748660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new set of illusions--the dynamic luminance-gradient illusion and the breathing light illusion. Gori S; Stubbs DA Perception; 2006; 35(11):1573-7. PubMed ID: 17286125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Size and position are incongruous: measurements on the Müller-Lyer figure. Gillam B; Chambers D Percept Psychophys; 1985 Jun; 37(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 4059013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent size and receptive field properties. van Erning LJ; Gerrits HJ; Eijkman EG Vision Res; 1988; 28(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 3188404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A depth illusion supports the model of General Object Constancy: Size and depth constancies related by a same distance-scaling factor. Qian J; Petrov Y Vision Res; 2016 Dec; 129():77-86. PubMed ID: 27810350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The moon illusion revisited. Iavecchia JH; Iavecchia HP; Roscoe SN Aviat Space Environ Med; 1983 Jan; 54(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6830556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The tilt illusion: length and luminance changes of induction line and third (disinhibiting) line. O'Toole BI Percept Psychophys; 1979 Jun; 25(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 492914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Some Illusions Are More Inconsistent Than Others. Smeets JBJ; Brenner E Perception; 2019 Jul; 48(7):638-641. PubMed ID: 31126210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial and orientation specific integration in the tilt illusion. Johnstone S; Wenderoth P Perception; 1989; 18(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 2771594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Size, flux and luminance effects in the apparent motion correspondence process. Shechter S; Hochstein S Vision Res; 1989; 29(5):579-91. PubMed ID: 2603395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]