99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7433250)
1. Histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma.
Böcking A; Sinagowitz E
Pathol Res Pract; 1980; 168(1-3):115-25. PubMed ID: 7433250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma.
Böcking A; Kiehn J; Heinzel-Wach M
Cancer; 1982 Jul; 50(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 7083133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Grading prostate cancer.
Bostwick DG
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Oct; 102(4 Suppl 1):S38-56. PubMed ID: 7524306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histopathology of prostate carcinoma. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis.
Dhom G
Pathol Res Pract; 1985 Jan; 179(3):277-303. PubMed ID: 2580293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histologic grade in penile squamous cell carcinoma: visual estimation versus digital measurement of proportions of grades, adverse prognosis with any proportion of grade 3 and correlation of a Gleason-like system with nodal metastasis.
Chaux A; Torres J; Pfannl R; Barreto J; Rodriguez I; Velazquez EF; Cubilla AL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jul; 33(7):1042-8. PubMed ID: 19384189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Correlation between histologic grading and prognosis of prostatic cancer--comparing the grading system of the Japanese general rules of prostatic cancer with Gleason's grading].
Hioki T; Sugimura Y; Sakurai M; Hayashi N; Tochigi H; Kawamura J; Yatani R
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Aug; 36(8):921-6. PubMed ID: 2239593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immunohistochemical antibody cocktail staining (p63/HMWCK/AMACR) of ductal adenocarcinoma and Gleason pattern 4 cribriform and noncribriform acinar adenocarcinomas of the prostate.
Herawi M; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):889-94. PubMed ID: 17527076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequencies of different nuclear morphological features in prostate adenocarcinoma.
Rashid F; Ul Haque A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2011 Dec; 15(6):414-21. PubMed ID: 21849255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic significance of histologic grading compared with subclassification of papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Akslen LA; LiVolsi VA
Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1902-8. PubMed ID: 10760768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA-grading of prostatic carcinoma: prognostic validity and reproducibility.
Böcking A; Chatelain R; Orthen U; Gien G; von Kalckreuth G; Jocham D; Wohltmann D
Anticancer Res; 1988; 8(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 3358629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Histologic grading of primary prostatic carcinoma--study of Gleason histologic grading].
Uchijima Y; Kusuyama H; Okada K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1987 Aug; 33(8):1193-8. PubMed ID: 3425519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical studies on endocrine therapy of prostatic carcinoma (3): Histopathological features of prostatic carcinoma and its prognosis].
Kumamoto Y; Tsukamoto T; Umehara T; Harada M; Shimazaki J; Fuse H; Oshima H; Takeuchi H; Yoshida O; Okada K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Mar; 36(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 2191571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of P501S and PSA in the diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Sheridan T; Herawi M; Epstein JI; Illei PB
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Sep; 31(9):1351-5. PubMed ID: 17721190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do we truly see what we think we see? The role of cognitive bias in pathological interpretation.
Fandel TM; Pfnür M; Schäfer SC; Bacchetti P; Mast FW; Corinth C; Ansorge M; Melchior SW; Thüroff JW; Kirkpatrick CJ; Lehr HA
J Pathol; 2008 Oct; 216(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18683853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Correlation between histological grading and the prognosis of prostatic carcinoma--a comparative study of the Japanese General Rules of Prostatic Cancer (JGRPC) and Gleason's classification].
Uchida T; Go M; Nakajo H; Takagi Y; Murayama M; Honda N; Igarashi M; Ishibashi A; Koshiba K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Jan; 34(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 3376792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma. I. Prognostic significance of histopathologic features--problems involved in the architectural grading system.
Shimizu Y; Kamoi S; Amada S; Hasumi K; Akiyama F; Silverberg SG
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 9698465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas defined on the basis of mitosis and necrosis: a clinicopathologic study of 58 patients.
Hiltzik D; Carlson DL; Tuttle RM; Chuai S; Ishill N; Shaha A; Shah JP; Singh B; Ghossein RA
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(6):1286-95. PubMed ID: 16470605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma: well versus poorly differentiated type.
Adachi Y; Yasuda K; Inomata M; Sato K; Shiraishi N; Kitano S
Cancer; 2000 Oct; 89(7):1418-24. PubMed ID: 11013353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
