These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7434387)

  • 21. Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.
    Persliden J; Fransson V; Vitak B; Fagerberg G
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 8318296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Technological improvements in mammography over the past 20 years.
    Haus AG
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8302212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography.
    Klausz R; Shramchenko N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):369-74. PubMed ID: 15933139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammography instrumentation: recent developments.
    Rothenberg LN
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8302209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Clinical experience with mammography using grids (author's transl)].
    Luska G; Nüsslin F; Wagner HH
    Rofo; 1979 Oct; 131(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 159223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of mammographic screen-film systems.
    Arnold BA; Webster EW; Kalisher L
    Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 693873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Radiation dose to the sternum during mammography (author's transl)].
    Kallinger W; Kainberger F
    Rofo; 1978 Oct; 129(4):491-3. PubMed ID: 152249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent].
    Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S
    Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new low dose mammography technique.
    Chang CH; Sibala JL; Martin NL; Riley RC
    Rev Interam Radiol; 1977 Apr; 2(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 866902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Speed S sensitivity of film-screen systems and mode of action of different automatic illumination in general practice. I: Film-screen systems].
    Blendl C; Kondmann M; Müller J
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 9410006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Daylight development and mammography (author's transl)].
    Berry M
    J Radiol; 1982 Feb; 63(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 7086731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Attachment for mammography of own design (author's transl)].
    Boroń Z; Klucz J
    Pol Przegl Radiol Med Nukl; 1981; 45(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 7312657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Marten K; Kehbel S; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A study of mammographic exposure and detail visibility using three systems: Xerox 125, Min-R, and Xonics XERG.
    Stanton L; Villafana T; Day JL; Lightfoot DA; Stanton RE
    Radiology; 1979 Aug; 132(2):455-62. PubMed ID: 461808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Theoretical investigations for optimising the quantum in radiodiagnosis (author's transl)].
    Freyer G; Rosenkranz G
    Rofo; 1975 Dec; 123(6):571-9. PubMed ID: 129414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.