These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7435380)

  • 1. A comparison of aerosol sampling techniques: "open" versus "closed-face" filter cassettes.
    Beaulieu HJ; Fidino AV; Arlington KL; Buchan RM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Oct; 41(10):758-65. PubMed ID: 7435380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
    Lidén G; Surakka J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
    Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aerosol sampling efficiency of 37 mm filter cassettes.
    Buchan RM; Soderholm SC; Tillery MI
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Dec; 47(12):825-31. PubMed ID: 3593471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field comparison of 37-mm closed-face cassettes and IOM samplers.
    Demange M; Görner P; Elcabache JM; Wrobel R
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Mar; 17(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 11871756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A field comparison of the IOM inhalable aerosol sampler and a modified 37-mm cassette.
    Clinkenbeard RE; England EC; Johnson DL; Esmen NA; Hall TA
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Sep; 17(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 12216591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Size distribution and speciation of chromium in paint spray aerosol at an aerospace facility.
    Sabty-Daily RA; Harris PA; Hinds WC; Froines JR
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Jan; 49(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 15591325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Size distribution of chromate paint aerosol generated in a bench-scale spray booth.
    Sabty-Daily RA; Hinds WC; Froines JR
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Jan; 49(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 15596421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of fine particle measurements from a direct-reading instrument and a gravimetric sampling method.
    Kim JY; Magari SR; Herrick RF; Smith TJ; Christiani DC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Nov; 1(11):707-15. PubMed ID: 15673091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field testing of new aerosol sampling method with a porous curved surface as inlet.
    Hauck BC; Grinshpun SA; Reponen A; Reponen T; Willeke K; Bornschein RL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Oct; 58(10):713-9. PubMed ID: 9342831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies.
    Brouwer DH; Gijsbers JH; Lurvink MW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jul; 48(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 15240340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monitoring real-time aerosol distribution in the breathing zone.
    Martinelli CA; Harley NH; Lippmann M; Cohen BS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Apr; 44(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 6858855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the closed-face cassette at different orientations while measuring total particles.
    Cook DM; Sleeth DK; Thiese MS; Larson RR
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 25337937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Filter and leak penetration characteristics of a dust and mist filtering facepiece.
    Chen CC; Ruuskanen J; Pilacinski W; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Dec; 51(12):632-9. PubMed ID: 2270830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias in air sampling techniques used to measure inhalation exposure.
    Cohen BS; Harley NH; Lippmann M
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Mar; 45(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 6720582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a tractor cab using real-time aerosol counting instrumentation.
    Hall RM; Heitbrink WA; Reed LD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Jan; 17(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11800406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.