218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7435506)
1. Parham v. J. R.: "voluntary" commitment of minors to mental institutions.
Tiano LV
Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(1):125-49. PubMed ID: 7435506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An invitation to the dance: an empirical response to Chief Justice Warren Burger's "time-consuming procedural minuets" theory in Parham v. J.R.
Perlin ML
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):149-64. PubMed ID: 7317656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A footnote to Parham: Was J. L. a casualty of the mental health bar?
Lacoursiere RB
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 6640121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Due process in the "voluntary" civil commitment of juvenile wards.
Glaessner PO
J Leg Med; 1981 Jun; 2(2):169-92. PubMed ID: 6972431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutional law--due process--minor child may be "voluntarily" committed to mental institution by parents or guardian following precommitment approval.
Koller HM
Villanova Law Rev; 1980 Mar; 25(3):537-50. PubMed ID: 11665273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment of children by parents--Parham v. J.R.
Citarella KC
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(4):1001-25. PubMed ID: 11658638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Constitutional law--due process does not require an adversary hearing prior to commitment of children to mental hospitals by their parent or guardian.
Humphrey P
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1980; 20(1):269-75. PubMed ID: 11665162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Formal commitment hearings not necessary for children, Supreme Court rulings say.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Sep; 30(9):645, 649. PubMed ID: 468145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Children's rights after the supreme court's decision on Parham v. J.L. and J.R.
Frank CC
Child Welfare; 1980 Jun; 59(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 7379613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Parham v. J.R.: civil psychiatric commitment of minors.
Turner SA
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():263-80. PubMed ID: 10293011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R.
Spaulding WJ
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Power, uncertainty, and choice: the voluntary commitment of children--Parham v. J.L.
Simet DP
Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1982 May; 20(1):141-61. PubMed ID: 11658705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can parents "volunteer" their children into mental institutions: an analysis of Kremens v. Bartley and Parham v. J.L. and J.R.
Ment Retard Law; 1978 Jan; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 11686183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The legal rights of minors in the health care process II.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1979 Nov; 43(11):751. PubMed ID: 509951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
Appelbaum PS
Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Due process and voluntary commitment by parents of juveniles to mental health facilities.
Hodgeman RB
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1980; 49(1):259-69. PubMed ID: 11658342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Consent requirements for treatment of minors.
Thompson HA
Tex Med; 1989 Aug; 85(8):56-9. PubMed ID: 2763219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review.
Weiner BA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 33(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7095767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Institutionalization of juveniles: what process is due? Parham v. J.R.
Herbsleb J
Neb Law Rev; 1980; 59(1):190-213. PubMed ID: 11658460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicine and the law: treatment of minors--consent requirements.
Young MG
Tex Med; 1983 Jan; 79(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 6687501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
