These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 15-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis. Poirer NC; Pelletier LC; Pellerin M; Carrier M Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S57-61. PubMed ID: 9930418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early clinical results with the Xenomedica porcine bioprosthesis. Gallo I; Figueroa A; Duran CM Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Aug; 33(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 2413572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic evaluation of the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis in the small aortic anulus. Wortham DC; Tri TB; Bowen TE J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Apr; 81(4):615-20. PubMed ID: 7206770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to ten years. Riess FC; Bader R; Cramer E; Hansen L; Kleijnen B; Wahl G; Wallrath J; Winkel S; Bleese N Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 83(4):1310-8. PubMed ID: 17383332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves. Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemodynamic function of the Hancock standard orifice aortic valve bioprosthesis. Borkon AM; McIntosh CL; Jones M; Lipson LC; Kent KM; Morrow AG J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Oct; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 7278353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]