These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7436839)

  • 1. Digital measurement of pallor-disc ratio.
    Rosenthal AR; Falconer DG; Barrett P
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Nov; 98(11):2027-31. PubMed ID: 7436839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic computer-aided analysis of optic disc pallor in fundus photographs.
    Yang HK; Oh JE; Han SB; Kim KG; Hwang JM
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 97(4):e519-e525. PubMed ID: 30407733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative evaluation of pallor-disc ratio and colour of the optic disc by a photographic method.
    Zenker HJ; Mierdel P; Marré E
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1983; 220(4):184-6. PubMed ID: 6884781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scanning microdensitometry of optic disc pallor in glaucoma.
    Schwartz B; Kern J
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1977 Dec; 95(12):2159-65. PubMed ID: 588108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Conventional versus digital planimetry of optic disc photograph: a clinical comparative study].
    Nguyen NX; Horn FK; Langenbucher A; Mardin CY
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Nov; 218(11):727-32. PubMed ID: 11731900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement in assessing glaucomatous discs in a clinical teaching setting with stereoscopic disc photographs, planimetry, and laser scanning tomography.
    Hatch WV; Trope GE; Buys YM; Macken P; Etchells EE; Flanagan JG
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Apr; 8(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 10209725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Undilated versus dilated monoscopic smartphone-based fundus photography for optic nerve head evaluation.
    Wintergerst MWM; Brinkmann CK; Holz FG; Finger RP
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):10228. PubMed ID: 29980724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of optic nerve head parameters: comparison of optical coherence tomography with digital planimetry.
    Samarawickrama C; Pai A; Huynh SC; Burlutsky G; Jonas JB; Mitchell P
    J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(8):571-5. PubMed ID: 19826383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of optic disc cupping with digital fundus photographs.
    Constantinou M; Ferraro JG; Lamoureux EL; Taylor HR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 140(3):529-31. PubMed ID: 16139006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital versus film stereo-photography for assessment of the optic nerve head in glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients.
    Hasanreisoglu M; Priel E; Naveh L; Lusky M; Weinberger D; Benjamini Y; Gaton DD
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Mar; 22(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 21946551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc.
    Lichter PR
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1976; 74():532-72. PubMed ID: 867638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of optic nerve head assessment with a digital stereoscopic camera (discam), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and stereophotography.
    Correnti AJ; Wollstein G; Price LL; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Aug; 110(8):1499-505. PubMed ID: 12917163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital analysis of the optic disc with fundus camera: a study of variability].
    Gili Manzanaro P; Carrasco Font C; Martín Rodrigo JC; Yangüela Rodilla J; Arias Puente A
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2004 Mar; 79(3):125-30. PubMed ID: 15045654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variance owing to observer, repeat imaging, and fundus camera type on cup-to-disc ratio estimates by stereo planimetry.
    Kwon YH; Adix M; Zimmerman MB; Piette S; Greenlee EC; Alward WL; Abràmoff MD
    J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 19365196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated segmentation of optic disc region on retinal fundus photographs: Comparison of contour modeling and pixel classification methods.
    Muramatsu C; Nakagawa T; Sawada A; Hatanaka Y; Hara T; Yamamoto T; Fujita H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jan; 101(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 20546966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative assessment of optic nerve head pallor.
    Vilser W; Nagel E; Seifert BU; Riemer T; Weisensee J; Hammer M
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Apr; 29(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 18354244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer in Alzheimer's disease.
    Tsai CS; Ritch R; Schwartz B; Lee SS; Miller NR; Chi T; Hsieh FY
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1991 Feb; 109(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 1993028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; Morgan W; Tay-Kearney ML; Jitskaia L
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10529928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Morphometry of the optic nerve and retinal vessels in children by computer-assisted image analysis of fundus photographs.
    Strömland K; Hellström A; Gustavsson T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1995 Mar; 233(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 7758982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of optic area measurement using fundus photography and optical coherence tomography between optic nerve head drusen and control subjects.
    Flores-Rodríguez P; Gili P; Martín-Ríos MD; Grifol-Clar E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 23311663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.