These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7437175)

  • 1. Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.
    Hatle L; Angelsen BA; Tromsdal A
    Br Heart J; 1980 Mar; 43(3):284-92. PubMed ID: 7437175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Severity of aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler techniques].
    Nakamura K; Shiina T; Satomi G; Sakai K; Tamura K; Matsumura K; Umemura J; Magosaki N; Koyanagi H; Hirosawa K
    J Cardiol; 1987 Dec; 17(4):807-16. PubMed ID: 3333519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noninvasive assessment of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Ohlsson J; Wranne B
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Mar; 7(3):501-8. PubMed ID: 3950229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive assessment and differentiation of left ventricular outflow obstruction with Doppler ultrasound.
    Hatle L
    Circulation; 1981 Aug; 64(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 7195785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.
    Hatle L; Brubakk A; Tromsdal A; Angelsen B
    Br Heart J; 1978 Feb; 40(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 637964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous Doppler/catheter measurements of pressure gradients in aortic valve disease: a correction to the Bernoulli equation based on velocity decay in the stenotic jet.
    VanAuker MD; Hla A; Meisner JS; Strom JA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 10772051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Jet eccentricity: a misleading source of agreement between Doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis.
    VanAuker MD; Chandra M; Shirani J; Strom JA
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2001 Sep; 14(9):853-62. PubMed ID: 11547270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value and limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of aortic stenosis: a statistical analysis of 70 consecutive patients.
    Panidis IP; Mintz GS; Ross J
    Am Heart J; 1986 Jul; 112(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 3524170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Non-invasive evaluation of pressure gradients in aortic stenosis using Doppler ultrasound].
    Hoffmann A; Amann FW; Burckhardt D
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Nov; 112(45):1597-600. PubMed ID: 7156955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of severity of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography.
    Subramanyan R; Srinivasan M; Joy J; Tharakan J; Titus T; Venkitachalam CG; Balakrishnan KG
    Indian Heart J; 1990; 42(5):371-4. PubMed ID: 2086443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantification of transvalvular pressure differences in aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.
    Teien D; Eriksson P
    Int J Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 7(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 3156098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of the peak-to-peak pressure gradient in aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography.
    Zhang Y; Ihlen H; Nitter-Hauge S
    Int J Cardiol; 1986 Mar; 10(3):192-212. PubMed ID: 3957467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doppler ultrasonic assessment of aortic stenosis by analysis of axillary arterial blood velocity upstroke time.
    Barnes RW; Rittenhouse EA; Miller EV
    Chest; 1976 Jul; 70(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 1277931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound.
    Berger M; Berdoff RL; Gallerstein PE; Goldberg E
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Jan; 3(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 6690544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography.
    Hegrenaes L; Hatle L
    Br Heart J; 1985 Oct; 54(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 4052281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-invasive estimation of the mean pressure difference in aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.
    Teien D; Karp K; Eriksson P
    Br Heart J; 1986 Nov; 56(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 3539164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Doppler echocardiographic determination of aortic valve gradients].
    Kronik G; Siostrzonek P; Zangeneh M; Schmoliner R; Gössinger H; Mösslacher H
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1987 Oct; 99(20):712-5. PubMed ID: 2961132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis.
    Kilner PJ; Manzara CC; Mohiaddin RH; Pennell DJ; Sutton MG; Firmin DN; Underwood SR; Longmore DB
    Circulation; 1993 Apr; 87(4):1239-48. PubMed ID: 8462150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limitations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler gradients.
    Danielsen R; Nordrehaug JE; Stangeland L; Vik-Mo H
    Br Heart J; 1988 May; 59(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 3382566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging.
    Eichenberger AC; Jenni R; von Schulthess GK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):971-7. PubMed ID: 8470612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.