These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7437755)

  • 1. Hospital work load produced by breast-cancer screening programme run by trained non-medical staff.
    George WD; Sellwood RA; Asbury DA; Hartley G
    Br Med J; 1980 Sep; 281(6241):653-5. PubMed ID: 7437755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care.
    Timmers JM; den Heeten GJ; Adang EM; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
    Eur J Public Health; 2012 Dec; 22(6):925-9. PubMed ID: 22158996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for breast cancer.
    George WD; Gleave EN; England PC; Wilson MC; Sellwood RA; Asbury D; Hartley G; Barker PG; Hobbs P; Wakefield J
    Br Med J; 1976 Oct; 2(6040):858-60. PubMed ID: 990724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new breast screening programme--an audit of the first year.
    Kirby RM; Williams M; Hopper G; Skinner MD; French C; Suarez V; Summerly ME; Gray JG
    Postgrad Med J; 1991 Jan; 67(783):36-8. PubMed ID: 2057424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of non-medical staff in screening for breast cancer.
    George WD; Sellwood RA; Asbury D; Hartley G
    Br Med J; 1980 Jan; 280(6208):147-9. PubMed ID: 7357293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opportunistic breast cancer screening in Hong Kong; a revisit of the Kwong Wah Hospital experience.
    Lui CY; Lam HS; Chan LK; Tam KF; Chan CM; Leung TY; Mak KL
    Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Apr; 13(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 17406037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating self-referral for mammography into organised screening: results from an Italian experience.
    Bucchi L; Falcini F; Baraldi GP; Bondi A; Bonsanto R; Bravetti P; Desiderio F; de Bianchi PS
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 14561265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The effectiveness of population-based breast cancer screening programme].
    Szynglarewicz B; Matkowski R; Kasprzak P; Kotowska J; Forgacz J; Pudełko M; Kornafel J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 Feb; 26(152):117-20. PubMed ID: 19388515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography screening--reasons for recall and the influence of experience on recall in the Finnish system.
    Pamilo M; Anttinen I; Soiva M; Roiha M; Suramo I
    Clin Radiol; 1990 Jun; 41(6):384-7. PubMed ID: 2383951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; van Ineveld BM; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jun; 44(9):1223-8. PubMed ID: 18400488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Need for open access non-screening mammography in a hospital with a specialist breast clinic service.
    Curtin JJ; Sampson MA
    BMJ; 1992 Feb; 304(6826):549-51. PubMed ID: 1559063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Referral policy and positive predictive value of call for surgical biopsy in the Florence Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Ciatto S; Cecchini S; del Turco MR; Grazzini G; Iossa A; Bartoli D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1990; 43(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 2182788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Referral for mammography often not according to guideline].
    Lodder-van der Vlies D; Droogh-de Greve K; de Win JL; van der Zaag-Loonen HJ; van Bruggen JA; Markestein HP; Gratama JW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8636. PubMed ID: 25804111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Once is enough--why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme.
    Elwood M; McNoe B; Smith T; Bandaranayake M; Doyle TC
    N Z Med J; 1998 May; 111(1066):180-3. PubMed ID: 9640316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analysis of referral patterns from a breast screening unit.
    Whitehouse GH; Leinster SJ; Al-Sumidaie AM; McDicken IW
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Nov; 37(6):555-9. PubMed ID: 3791852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.