These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7438879)
21. Medical malpractice litigation: cross-examination of the medical expert. Volk MD Trial; 1980 May; 16(5):38, 43-4, 74. PubMed ID: 10297935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [The surgeon's role as expert witness in malpractice lawsuits. Purpose and requirements of legal medical opinions]. Bauch J; Meier J; Ulsenheimer K Chirurg; 2005 Dec; 76(12):1185-97; quiz 1198-9. PubMed ID: 16323031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--legal evaluation of medical expert opinion]. Schlund GH Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):596-602. PubMed ID: 9064930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Court recognizes medical expert testimony of nonphysician professional person. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1983 May; 64(5):68, 70. PubMed ID: 10324256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Autopsy refusal and reversal of the proof responsibility in the malpractice process]. Jansen C Pathologe; 1993 Mar; 14(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 8469647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Holding expert witnesses accountable for their actions and opinions. Ramseyer L J Okla State Med Assoc; 2004 Apr; 97(4):152. PubMed ID: 15141768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Medical malpractice: is the testimony expert? Francis JD Md Med; 2004; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 15079939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Adversarial medical and scientific testimony and lay jurors: a proposal for medical malpractice reform. Menon JW Am J Law Med; 1995; 21(2-3):281-300. PubMed ID: 8571979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [The law and medicine--from the viewpoint of the medical expert]. Carstensen G Med Welt; 1982 Sep; 33(37):1278-80. PubMed ID: 7132683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Medical expert assessment in the Anglo-American lawsuit]. Deutsch E Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):648-52. PubMed ID: 9064941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sanctions for failure to disclose medical malpractice experts. Mendelson v. Feingold. Boblick SS Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 27(2):177-99. PubMed ID: 6927797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Medical expert assessment and civil and criminal law from the viewpoint of arbitration services and the expert committee]. Vorster C Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):586-9. PubMed ID: 9064927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Legal responsibility of the physician for treatment, organization and patient education errors]. Ulsenheimer K Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):562-70. PubMed ID: 8588424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]