These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7438880)

  • 1. [Expert judicial opinions in questions of liability].
    Quenu L
    Chirurgie; 1980; 106(7):555-6. PubMed ID: 7438880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Expert testimony in malpractice suits].
    Deutsch E
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 8588427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert or fact witness: is there a legal obligation to testify?
    West RW; Sipe CY
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):906-7. PubMed ID: 17411731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Expert opinions regarding medical responsibility].
    Sarda F
    Chirurgie; 1980; 106(7):553-4. PubMed ID: 7438879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heterodoxy, iconoclasm and spuriousness: the limits of novel expert evidence.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):323-36. PubMed ID: 18251417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A basic understanding of the judicial procedure.
    Dusesoi J
    Acta Chir Belg; 2000; 100(4):165-8. PubMed ID: 11280187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Improper medical practices and expert testimony in medical responsibility].
    Develay-Le Gueut M; Penneau M
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1986; 36(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 2979370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Expert evaluation commissions for medical liability questions in the Medical Council of Westfalen-Lippe. Report on their activity up to the present].
    Reiermann E
    Med Welt; 1982 Sep; 33(37):1267-9. PubMed ID: 6897096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
    Hawkins TS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines for expert witness testimony in medical malpractice litigation. Committee on Medical Liability. American Academy of Pediatrics.
    Pediatrics; 2002 May; 109(5):974-9. PubMed ID: 11986466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Expert testimony in malpractice from the physician's viewpoint].
    Vorster CF
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):584-9; discussion 589-94. PubMed ID: 8588428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expert testimony: a contrary perspective from the trenches.
    Berlin L
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17411782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law from the legal liability viewpoint].
    Kümper HJ
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):589-90; discussion 591. PubMed ID: 9064928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Counseling center for forensic expert questions of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Professional Society of Gynecologists].
    Ratzel R; Schneider J; Ludwig H
    Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 7959313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical malpractice: is the testimony expert?
    Francis JD
    Md Med; 2004; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 15079939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expert medical testimony is generally required to prove medical negligence.
    McCarter WD; Hayek TJ
    Mo Med; 2001 Oct; 98(10):488-9. PubMed ID: 11668860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--legal evaluation of medical expert opinion].
    Schlund GH
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):596-602. PubMed ID: 9064930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Conflicting expert opinions from the legal viewpoint].
    Pelz FJ
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):636-9. PubMed ID: 9064938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidelines for experts reviewing Papanicolaou smear litigation cases.
    Frable WJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 9111129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The assessment of expert testimony relevance and admissibility in medical malpractice cases in the Czech Republic. Can American judicial practice help us?
    Zakharov S
    Med Law; 2011 Mar; 30(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 21528803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.