These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7440422)

  • 1. Quantitative investigation of the 'paired-click' method: some limitations and insights.
    Pick GF; Narins PM
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 7440422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The spectro-temporal receptive field. A functional characteristic of auditory neurons.
    Aertsen AM; Johannesma PI
    Biol Cybern; 1981; 42(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 7326288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Responses of auditory nerve fibers of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat to click pairs as simulated echoes.
    Parham K; Zhao HB; Kim DO
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 8836205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-fiber interspike interval probability distribution in acoustic stimulation: a computer modeling study.
    Au D; Bruce I; Irlicht L; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():346-9. PubMed ID: 7668700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wiener and Volterra analyses applied to the auditory system.
    Eggermont JJ
    Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 66(2):177-201. PubMed ID: 8509309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First-spike timing of auditory-nerve fibers and comparison with auditory cortex.
    Heil P; Irvine DR
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Nov; 78(5):2438-54. PubMed ID: 9356395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compound action potential and single acoustic nerve fibres activity generation: an equivalent neuron approach.
    Biondi E; Dacquino G; Grandori F
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1975 Jul; 6(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 1176189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of recovery properties on the discharge pattern of auditory nerve fibres.
    Lütkenhöner B; Hoke M; Bappert E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979 Mar; 11():25-43. PubMed ID: 299187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Method to record evoked potentials from the frog eighth nerve.
    Seaman RL
    Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 51(2):301-5. PubMed ID: 2032964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability of amplitude and area of the auditory nerve compound action potential.
    Brown M; McAnally KI; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Nov; 117(6):836-40. PubMed ID: 9442823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intracranially recorded responses from the human auditory nerve: new insights into the origin of brain stem evoked potentials (BSEPs).
    Møller AR; Jannetta P; Bennett M; Møller MB
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Jul; 52(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 6166449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First order temporal properties of spontaneous and tone-evoked activity of auditory afferent neurones in the cochlear ganglion of the pigeon.
    Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 1991 Oct; 55(2):143-66. PubMed ID: 1757283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative model for the effects of stimulus frequency upon synchronization of auditory nerve discharges.
    Anderson DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1973 Aug; 54(2):361-4. PubMed ID: 4202381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer dissection of the auditory evoked potential: a comment on Schweitzer.
    Hillyard SA
    Percept Psychophys; 1978 Jun; 23(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 683839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory nerve rate-level functions for two-tone stimuli: possible relation to basilar membrane nonlinearity.
    Sokolowski BH; Sachs MB; Goldstein JL
    Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 41(2-3):115-23. PubMed ID: 2808144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model for the electrostimulation of the nervus acusticus.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Hochmair ES; Motz H; Rattay F
    Neuroscience; 1984 Oct; 13(2):553-62. PubMed ID: 6549052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear models: two-tone suppression and the second filter.
    Hall JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1722-8. PubMed ID: 7372926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation of mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor.
    Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):702-11. PubMed ID: 2870094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On lateral inhibition in the auditory system.
    Kral A; Majernik V
    Gen Physiol Biophys; 1996 Apr; 15(2):109-27. PubMed ID: 8899416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postsynaptic inhibition can explain the concentration of short inter-spike-intervals in avian auditory nerve fibres.
    Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 1991 Oct; 55(2):231-43. PubMed ID: 1757291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.