BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7440426)

  • 1. Stimulation of efferents alters the cochlear microphonic and the sound-induced resistance changes measured in scale media of the guinea pig.
    Mountain DC; Geisler CD; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 7440426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voltage-dependent elements are involved in the generation of the cochlear microphonic and the sound-induced resistance changes measured in scala media of the guinea pig.
    Mountain DC; Hubbard AE; Geisler CD
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 7440425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the spectra of the cochlear microphonic and of the sound-elicited electrical impedance changes measured in scala media of the guinea pig.
    Hubbard AE; Geisler CD; Mountain DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):431-45. PubMed ID: 512204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics.
    Mountain DC
    Science; 1980 Oct; 210(4465):71-2. PubMed ID: 7414321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The spectral content of the cochlear microphonic measured in scala media of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Hubbard AE; Mountain DC; Geisler CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):415-30. PubMed ID: 512203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations of cochlear microphonic potential after sectioning efferent fibers to the cochlea.
    Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(2-3):267-71. PubMed ID: 3680069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity.
    Siegel JH; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Feb; 6(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 7061350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sound-induced resistance changes in the inner ear.
    Geisler CD; Mountain DC; Hubbard AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1729-35. PubMed ID: 7372927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does electrical stimulation of the crossed olivo-cochlear bundle produce movement of the organ of Corti?
    Patuzzi R; Rajan R
    Hear Res; 1990 Apr; 45(1-2):15-32. PubMed ID: 2345114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ionic mechanism of the efferent olivo-cochlear inhibition studied by cochlear perfusion in the cat.
    Desmedt JE; Robertson D
    J Physiol; 1975 May; 247(2):407-28. PubMed ID: 1097639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of sectioning auditory centrifugal fibers on the cochlear microphonic and action potential in guinea pigs.
    Talbott RE; Barry J; Barry SJ
    J Aud Res; 1978 Oct; 18(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 756871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency dependence of cochlear microphonic augmentation produced by olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation.
    Kittrell BJ; Dalland JI
    Laryngoscope; 1969 Feb; 79(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 5765246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of electrical stimulation of the olivo cochlear bundle at the cochlear level.
    Buño W; García-Ausit E
    Acta Neurol Latinoam; 1970; 16(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 5538050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DC potentials of the lateral wall of the scala media.
    Urquiza R; Diez de los Rios A
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 244(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 3662931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters.
    Rajan R
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Aug; 60(2):549-68. PubMed ID: 3171641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of electrical stimulation of medial olivocochlear neurons on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear responses.
    Gifford ML; Guinan JJ
    Hear Res; 1987; 29(2-3):179-94. PubMed ID: 3624082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of low-frequency ultrasound on the inner ear: an electrophysiological study using the guinea pig cochlea.
    Ishida A; Matsui T; Yamamura K
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 250(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 8466746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in cochlear microphonic and neural sensitivity produced by acoustic trauma.
    Patuzzi RB; Yates GK; Johnstone BM
    Hear Res; 1989 May; 39(1-2):189-202. PubMed ID: 2737965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biasing of the summating potentials.
    Durrant JD; Gans D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(1-2):13-8. PubMed ID: 1080943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masked cochlear whole-nerve response intensity functions altered by electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.
    Dolan DF; Nuttall AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1081-6. PubMed ID: 3356813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.