These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7441674)
1. Reliability and validity studies on modified essay questions. Feletti GI J Med Educ; 1980 Nov; 55(11):933-41. PubMed ID: 7441674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper. Palmer EJ; Devitt PG BMC Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 7():49. PubMed ID: 18045500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cognitive structure of the modified essay question. Irwin WG; Bamber JH Med Educ; 1982 Nov; 16(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 7176979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modified essay questions: are they worth the effort? Feletti GI; Smith EK Med Educ; 1986 Mar; 20(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 3959927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How do medical students actually think while solving problems in three different types of clinical assessments in Korea: Clinical performance examination (CPX), multimedia case-based assessment (CBA), and modified essay question (MEQ). Kim S; Choi I; Yoon BY; Kwon MJ; Choi SJ; Kim SH; Lee JT; Rhee BD J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2019; 16():10. PubMed ID: 31071764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Modified Essay Questions (MEQ) and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) as a tool for Assessing the Cognitive Skills of Undergraduate Medical Students. Khan MU; Aljarallah BM Int J Health Sci (Qassim); 2011 Jan; 5(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 22489228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment. Mahmood H J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and validity of simulated problems as measures of change in problem-solving skills. Robinson SA; Dinham SM Annu Conf Res Med Educ; 1977; 16():305-10. PubMed ID: 606094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine? Hift RJ BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():249. PubMed ID: 25431359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Objective measurement of clinical performance. Norman GR Med Educ; 1985 Jan; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3969023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity and reliability of a new examination of the clinical competence of medical students. Newble DI; Hoare J; Elmslie RG Med Educ; 1981 Jan; 15(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 7464591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors underlying performance on written tests of knowledge. Norman GR; Smith EK; Powles AC; Rooney PJ; Henry NL; Dodd PE Med Educ; 1987 Jul; 21(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 3626897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On line clinical reasoning assessment with Script Concordance test in urology: results of a French pilot study. Sibert L; Darmoni SJ; Dahamna B; Hellot MF; Weber J; Charlin B BMC Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 6():45. PubMed ID: 16938134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of performance of final-year students from three Australian medical schools. Saunders NA; McIntosh J; Prince RL; Feletti GI; Engel CE; Lawrence JR; Pitney WR; Hughes JL; Marshall JR Med J Aust; 1987 Oct; 147(8):385-8. PubMed ID: 3657675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A problem-based criterion-referenced examination of clinical competence. Newble DI; Elmslie RG; Baxter A J Med Educ; 1978 Sep; 53(9):720-6. PubMed ID: 691025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating preclinical medical students by using computer-based problem-solving examinations. Stevens RH; Kwak AR; McCoy JM Acad Med; 1989 Nov; 64(11):685-7. PubMed ID: 2679616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pilot experiment on the inter-examiner reliability of short essay questions. Wakeford RE; Roberts S Med Educ; 1979 Sep; 13(5):342-4. PubMed ID: 522685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer Assisted Objective Structured Clinical Examination: a useful tool for dermatology undergraduate assessment. Grover C; Bhattacharya SN; Pandhi D; Singal A; Kumar P Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2012; 78(4):519. PubMed ID: 22772635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the clinical problem-solving process using a simulation technique. Harasym P; Baumber J; Bryant H; Fundytus D; Preshaw R; Watanabe M; Wyse G Med Educ; 1980 Nov; 14(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 7442576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of the evaluation of students' answers to essay-type questions. Anatol T; Hariharan S West Indian Med J; 2009 Jan; 58(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 19565993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]