135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7443210)
1. Comparative evaluation of the Autofield-I, CFA-120, and Fieldmaster Model 101-PR automated perimeters.
Johnson CA; Keltner JL
Ophthalmology; 1980 Aug; 87(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 7443210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of Fieldmaster automated perimeter for the detection of early visual field changes in glaucoma.
Hong C; Kitazawa Y; Shirato S
Int Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 7068332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated suprathreshold static perimetry.
Johnson CA; Keltner JL
Am J Ophthalmol; 1980 May; 89(5):731-41. PubMed ID: 7377271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of Goldmann, Fieldmaster 200, and Dicon AP2000 perimeters used in a screening mode.
Mills RP
Ophthalmology; 1984 Apr; 91(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 6717919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical experience with the Fieldmaster perimeter.
Bobrow JC; Drews RC
Am J Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 93(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 7065096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects.
Heijl A; Drance SM
Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 May; 99(5):832-6. PubMed ID: 7236085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of automated perimetry in following glaucomatous visual field progression.
Keltner JL; Johnson CA
Ophthalmology; 1982 Mar; 89(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 7088508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter.
Beck RW; Bergstrom TJ; Lichter PR
Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 3974997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Threshold equivalence between perimeters.
Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Alward WL; Skuta GL
Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 May; 107(5):493-505. PubMed ID: 2712132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of diagnostic capabilities of interactive test strategies in automated perimetry.
Mills RP
Ophthalmology; 1985 Sep; 92(9):1181-6. PubMed ID: 4058880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The fieldmaster 101 PR automatic visual field screener--technical evaluation and clinical results.
de Boer RW; van den Berg TJ; Greve EL; Bos HJ
Doc Ophthalmol; 1982 Dec; 53(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 7166098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated perimetry in a neuro-ophthalmologic practice.
Schindler S; McCrary JA
Ann Ophthalmol; 1981 Jun; 13(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 7258961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The specificity of the automated suprathreshold perimeter Fieldmaster 200.
Gramer E; Steinhauser B; Krieglstein GK
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1982; 218(5):253-5. PubMed ID: 7095449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of quantitative testing with the Octopus, Humphrey, and Tübingen perimeters.
Mills RP; Hopp RH; Drance SM
Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Oct; 102(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 3766667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mass visual field screening in a driving population.
Keltner JL; Johnson CA
Ophthalmology; 1980 Aug; 87(8):785-92. PubMed ID: 7443211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Techniques and developments in automated perimetry: a review.
Wild JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(3):295-308. PubMed ID: 3077648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simulator for teaching visual field techniques on Goldmann or Goldmann-type perimeters.
Hass I; Drance SM; Fairclough M
Am J Ophthalmol; 1979 Aug; 88(2):259-60. PubMed ID: 474698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of four projection perimeters.
Portney GL; Hanible JE
Am J Ophthalmol; 1976 May; 81(5):678-81. PubMed ID: 1275048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dethecting glaucomatous damage with the Friedmann analyzer compared with te Goldmann perimeter and evaluation of stereoscopic photographs of the optic disk.
Batko KA; Anctil JL; Anderson DR
Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 95(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 6837687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The Fieldmaster-200 computer perimeter: a comparative, controlled clinical study of its sensitivity and specificity in glaucomatous field defects (author's transl)].
Krieglstein GK; Glaab E; Gramer E
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 Nov; 179(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7040780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
