BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7443912)

  • 1. On the use of distractors for testing recognition memory.
    Wallace WP
    Psychol Bull; 1980 Nov; 88(3):696-704. PubMed ID: 7443912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition of facial stimuli following an intervening task involving the Identi-kit.
    Comish SE
    J Appl Psychol; 1987 Aug; 72(3):488-91. PubMed ID: 3624154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Iconic memory for elementary visual characteristics: on a poorly accessible visual store and the long-lasting icon].
    Schulz T
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1981-1982; 134(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 7347590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Hemispheric specialization, perception of and memory for words].
    Juan de Mendoza JL; Grosso D
    Annee Psychol; 1980; 80(2):367-78. PubMed ID: 7235641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Memory code for verbally and film-presented action sequences].
    Riff B; Vanecek E
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1986; 138(3):185-99. PubMed ID: 3579546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal aspects of selective masking.
    Lowe DG
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1975 Aug; 27(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 1196587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Temporal course of a so-called automatic visual attention process].
    Weichselgartner E
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1985; 32(4):665-81. PubMed ID: 4060781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Figure recognition and reproduction in hearing, hard of hearing and deaf children: an empirical analysis].
    Reimann B
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1987; 195(2):209-22. PubMed ID: 2892319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image detail and recall: evidence for within-item elaboration.
    Ritchey GH; Beal CR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Jan; 6(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 7373244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Performance increasing effect of self-caused failure: behavioral effects of attributions].
    Haisch J
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1987; 139(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 3632332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition memory for faces with and without spectacles.
    McKelvie SJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Dec; 65(3):705-6. PubMed ID: 3438114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Levels-of-processing effects in infant memory?
    Adler SA; Gerhardstein P; Rovee-Collier C
    Child Dev; 1998 Apr; 69(2):280-94. PubMed ID: 9586205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging, memory and visual search.
    Kramer AF; Boot WR; McCarley JS; Peterson MS; Colcombe A; Scialfa CT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):288-304. PubMed ID: 16438921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The imagery factor in hypnotic hypermnesia.
    Dywan J
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1988 Oct; 36(4):312-26. PubMed ID: 3209271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention gating in short-term visual memory.
    Reeves A; Sperling G
    Psychol Rev; 1986 Apr; 93(2):180-206. PubMed ID: 3714927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective.
    Sluzenski J; Newcombe NS; Kovacs SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 16478343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive processing capacity and heart rate in recognition memory for numbers and random shapes.
    Kribbs NB; Shaffer JI; Muswick G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Aug; 59(1):241-2. PubMed ID: 6493940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Very young children are insensitive to picture- but not object-orientation.
    Pierroutsakos SL; Deloache JS; Gound M; Bernard EN
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15985066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.