These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. [Use of ceruletide in oral cholecystography]. Romagnoli U; Ripoli G; Salvatori G Radiol Med; 1976 Mar; 62(3):202-15. PubMed ID: 802908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Oral cholecystography in children]. Fortier-Beaulieu M; Chaumont P J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56(8-9):610-2. PubMed ID: 1185709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative review of the results of a study of the gallbladder using contrast methods (personal experience)]. Lazić M; Marton B; Libman E Med Pregl; 1983; 36(9-10):437-40. PubMed ID: 6674733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Complications of oral cholecystography. Results of an survey by the French Radiological Society]. Nahum H; Levesoue M J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56(8-9):614-5. PubMed ID: 1185711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical and chemical aspects of residual contrast media in the intestine during oral cholecystography with Trijobil and Falignost]. Quasdorf M; Becker C; Quasdorf G; Becker HW Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1977; 18(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 866607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Nonvisualized gallbladder in cholecystography per os: radiotomographic study after a second dose]. Gasparini G; Guzzon A; Lombardi F Radiol Med; 1976 Mar; 62(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 1078280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cholecysto-cholangiography. Opacification by 2 routes. Statistics of 300 cases in 5 years without complications]. Louant PH J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56 suppl 2():545-6. PubMed ID: 1232317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Minor complications encountered in oral cholecystography]. Djian A; Annonier C; Prouveur P J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56(8-9):613-4. PubMed ID: 1185710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Improvement by lecithin of contrast medium resorption in oral cholecystography]. Holstein J Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1981; 22(3):354-8. PubMed ID: 7330206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is oral cholecystography still useful? Amberg JR; Leopold GR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Jul; 151(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 3259823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Letter: For an new terminology in biliary radiology]. Bertrand L; Lamarque JL; Prioton JB; Bismuth V; Gaucher P; Laval-Jeantet M; Mallet P Nouv Presse Med; 1974 Oct; 3(36):2334. PubMed ID: 4456297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of fasting on opacification of the gallbladder during oral cholecystography using two consecutive doses in a canine model. Thoeni RF; Moss AA; Stoughton JA Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 468495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Isolated opacification of the main biliary duct in the course of oral cholecystography]. Vadrot D; Benchetrit J; Johner J; Mouzon A; Doyon D J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56(8-9):605. PubMed ID: 1185705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Does oral and intravenous "refill" cholegraphy have nephrotoxic effects?]. Bor K; Elek S; Elekes I; Polgári I; Csákány G Orv Hetil; 1984 Apr; 125(14):815-9. PubMed ID: 6709344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Technic of perfusion cholecystography compared with i.v. cholecystography. Which has a lower percentage of complications?]. Birzu I; Percek A J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56 suppl 1():47. PubMed ID: 1232221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]