These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7444524)

  • 21. The Canadian Urology Fair: a model for minimizing the financial and academic costs of the residency selection process.
    Grober ED; Matsumoto ED; Jewett MA; Chin JL;
    Can J Surg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 14680354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Plagiarised letters of recommendation submitted for the National Resident Matching Program.
    Maruca-Sullivan PE; Lane CE; Moore EZ; Ross DA
    Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 52(6):632-640. PubMed ID: 29508419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Behind the Match Process: Is There Any Financial Difference Lurking Below the Specialty of Choice?
    Oladeji LO; Raley JA; Smith S; Perez JL; McGwin G; Ponce BA
    Am Surg; 2016 Dec; 82(12):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 28234179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of web-based and face-to-face interviews for application to an anesthesiology training program: a pilot study.
    Vadi MG; Malkin MR; Lenart J; Stier GR; Gatling JW; Applegate RL
    Int J Med Educ; 2016 Apr; 7():102-8. PubMed ID: 27039029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria.
    Bernstein AD; Jazrawi LM; Elbeshbeshy B; Della Valle CJ; Zuckerman JD
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2002-2003; 61(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 12828380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The prevalence and cost of medical student visiting rotations.
    Winterton M; Ahn J; Bernstein J
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):291. PubMed ID: 27842590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interview Day Environment May Influence Applicant Selection of Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.
    Lewis J; Dubosh N; Rosen C; Schoenfeld D; Fisher J; Ullman E
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 18(1):142-145. PubMed ID: 28116027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process.
    Ward M; Pingree C; Laury AM; Bowe SN
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 143(8):782-787. PubMed ID: 28542682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The urology residency matching program in practice.
    Teichman JM; Anderson KD; Dorough MM; Stein CR; Optenberg SA; Thompson IM
    J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1878-87. PubMed ID: 10799214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of a rural emergency department rotation on applicant ranking of a US emergency medicine residency program.
    Wadman MC; Hoffman LH; Erickson T; Tran TP; Muelleman RL
    Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(4):686. PubMed ID: 18047392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
    Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Qualities of residency applicants: comparison of otolaryngology program criteria with applicant expectations.
    Puscas L; Sharp SR; Schwab B; Lee WT
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jan; 138(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 22249622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Applicant selection procedures in endodontic specialty programs in the United States: program director's perspective.
    Bell LT; Sukotjo C; Yuan JC; Johnson BR
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 24862706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Answers to applicant selection from a directory of residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Metheny WP; Ling FW; Holzman GB; Mitchum MJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 88(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 8684746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An Assessment of Radiology Residency Program Websites.
    Hansberry DR; Bornstein J; Agarwal N; McClure KE; Deshmukh SP; Long S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Apr; 15(4):663-666. PubMed ID: 29273474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 22000541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of 0 + 5 versus 5 + 2 applicants to vascular surgery training programs.
    Zayed MA; Dalman RL; Lee JT
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 56(5):1448-52. PubMed ID: 22857814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Examination of Nondesignated Preliminary Surgery Residents Recruited Since the Inception of Supplementary Offer and Acceptance Program: Lessons Learned From a Large Academic Program.
    Albuja-Cruz M; Travis C; Benge M; Caufield B; Nehler M
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(2):294-298. PubMed ID: 28886935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors influencing the number of applications submitted per applicant to orthopedic residency programs.
    Finkler ES; Fogel HA; Kroin E; Kliethermes S; Wu K; Nystrom LM; Schiff AP
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():31865. PubMed ID: 27448634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency.
    Weissbart SJ; Stock JA; Wein AJ
    Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):731-6. PubMed ID: 25817098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.