These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Importance of serological methods of study in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis in young children]. Sluchenkova LD Vopr Okhr Materin Det; 1979 Apr; 24(4):48-50. PubMed ID: 442605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [On the diagnosis of human erysipeloid]. Rudat KD Hautarzt; 1967 Apr; 18(4):156-8. PubMed ID: 5626361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Production of erysipeloid antibody erythrocytes as diagnostic agents of differing specificity]. Denisov GI; Karal'nik BV Lab Delo; 1987; (3):171-6. PubMed ID: 2438454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of serological reactions in infectious diseases]. Sommergruber D; Blatz R; Falkenhagen U; Lange R; Müller WA Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1982 Mar; 76(6):234-9. PubMed ID: 7051587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of heat with reducing substances for the evaluation of IgM in rabbit serum]. Pessôa MH; Suassuna I; de Oliveira LM Rev Latinoam Microbiol; 1980; 22(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 7291774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the direct agglutination test, fast agglutination screening test, and rK39 dipstick test for the sero-diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in Syria. Al-Nahhas SA; Al-Taweel AA; Al-Taweel MA Saudi Med J; 2008 Sep; 29(9):1250-4. PubMed ID: 18813406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic value of rapid agglutination test in swine erysipelas]. GENEV Kh; KHRISTOFOROV L Izv Mikrobiol Inst (Sofiia); 1953; 4():139-47. PubMed ID: 13232824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Utilization of serological methods in the retrospective diagnosis of cholera and in detecting vibrion carriers]. Bunin KV; Firsanov VI; Kravtsov EG; Nechaeva IP; Efimov DD Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1975 Oct; (10):98-101. PubMed ID: 1210898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the usefulness of six commercial agglutination assays for serologic diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Villard O; Cimon B; Franck J; Fricker-Hidalgo H; Godineau N; Houze S; Paris L; Pelloux H; Villena I; Candolfi E; Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Jul; 73(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 22541791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Experimental comparison and evaluation of 3 methods of detecting salmonella group B antigens (agglutination, indirect hemagglutination and coagglutination reactions)]. Smirnova GV Lab Delo; 1986; (1):45-8. PubMed ID: 2419652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A quantitative comparison of the sensitivity of serological test for bovine brucellosis to different antibody classes. Allan GS; Chappel RJ; Williamson P; McNaught DJ J Hyg (Lond); 1976 Apr; 76(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 1063217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]