These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7446646)
1. An evaluation of the accuracy of community-based perimetry. Trobe JD; Acosta PC; Shuster JJ; Krischer JP Am J Ophthalmol; 1980 Nov; 90(5):654-60. PubMed ID: 7446646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How effective is perimetry in current practice? Trobe JD Ophthalmology; 1983 Nov; 90(11):1380-3. PubMed ID: 6664679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects. Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for visual field abnormalities with automated perimetry. Keltner JL; Johnson CA Surv Ophthalmol; 1983; 28(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 6422573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A feasible development of computerized perimetry. Krakau CE Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1981 Aug; 59(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 7315206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tangent screen perimetry using twin test objects. Coyle JT; Milam DF Am J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jun; 83(6):923-4. PubMed ID: 868998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects. Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz de Zárate B Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry. Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of quantitative testing with the Octopus, Humphrey, and Tübingen perimeters. Mills RP; Hopp RH; Drance SM Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Oct; 102(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 3766667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structure-Function Correlation in Hemianopic Vision Loss in Children Aged 3-6 Years Using OCT and SVOP, and Comparison with Adult Eyes. Bowl W; Knobloch R; Schweinfurth S; Holve K; Stieger K; Lorenz B Ophthalmic Res; 2018; 60(4):221-230. PubMed ID: 29332093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma. Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single and multiple stimulus static perimetry in glaucoma; the two phases of perimetry. Thesis. Greve EL Doc Ophthalmol; 1973 Oct; 36():1-355. PubMed ID: 4744369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual fields: simplified screening and recording procedures. Vandeveer MR; Norden LC J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 6602825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]