These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7446646)

  • 1. An evaluation of the accuracy of community-based perimetry.
    Trobe JD; Acosta PC; Shuster JJ; Krischer JP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1980 Nov; 90(5):654-60. PubMed ID: 7446646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How effective is perimetry in current practice?
    Trobe JD
    Ophthalmology; 1983 Nov; 90(11):1380-3. PubMed ID: 6664679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.
    Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for visual field abnormalities with automated perimetry.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1983; 28(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 6422573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A feasible development of computerized perimetry.
    Krakau CE
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1981 Aug; 59(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 7315206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tangent screen perimetry using twin test objects.
    Coyle JT; Milam DF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jun; 83(6):923-4. PubMed ID: 868998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A screening method for chiasmal visual-field defects.
    Trobe JD; Acosta PC; Krischer JP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Feb; 99(2):264-71. PubMed ID: 7469863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An algorithm for visual fields.
    Trobe JD; Acosta PC
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1980; 24(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 7414506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A portable hemianopsia tester.
    Bynke H; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1976 Apr; 54(2 p):174-84. PubMed ID: 946721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.
    Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz de Zárate B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suprathreshold static perimetry. Initial clinical trials with the Fieldmaster automated perimeter.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Balestrery FG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1979 Feb; 97(2):260-72. PubMed ID: 399178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-generated display for three-dimensional static perimetry.
    Hart WM; Hartz RK
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 100(2):312-8. PubMed ID: 7065952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of quantitative testing with the Octopus, Humphrey, and Tübingen perimeters.
    Mills RP; Hopp RH; Drance SM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Oct; 102(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 3766667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structure-Function Correlation in Hemianopic Vision Loss in Children Aged 3-6 Years Using OCT and SVOP, and Comparison with Adult Eyes.
    Bowl W; Knobloch R; Schweinfurth S; Holve K; Stieger K; Lorenz B
    Ophthalmic Res; 2018; 60(4):221-230. PubMed ID: 29332093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma.
    Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single and multiple stimulus static perimetry in glaucoma; the two phases of perimetry. Thesis.
    Greve EL
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1973 Oct; 36():1-355. PubMed ID: 4744369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual fields: simplified screening and recording procedures.
    Vandeveer MR; Norden LC
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 6602825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects?
    Fong KC; Byles DB; Constable PH
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Apr; 17(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12724694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.