These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7448039)

  • 61. Local contextual processing effects with increasing stimulus presentation rate.
    Fogelson N; Fernandez-del-Olmo M
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Jan; 23(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 20717841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparative study of visual and auditory reaction time of hands and feet in males and females.
    Misra N; Mahajan KK; Maini BK
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1985; 29(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 3842374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Hemispheric lateralization of the decisional stage in choice reaction times to visual unstructured stimuli.
    Bisiach E; Mini M; Sterzi R; Vallar G
    Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 7128169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Functional differences between superior and inferior visual hemifields obtained with non-structural stimuli].
    Magrotti E; Cosi V; Borutti G
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1980 Mar; 56(5):416-22. PubMed ID: 7387783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Difference in stimulus-response compatibility effect in premotor and motor time between upper and lower limbs.
    Kato Y; Asami T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):939-46. PubMed ID: 9885062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Neglect determined by the relative location of responses.
    Làdavas E; Farnè A; Carletti M; Zeloni G
    Brain; 1994 Aug; 117 ( Pt 4)():705-14. PubMed ID: 7922458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Role of hand dominance in mapping preferences for emotional-valence words to keypress responses.
    Song X; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():33-39. PubMed ID: 28823632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Influences of hand posture and hand position on compatibility effects for up-down stimuli mapped to left-right responses: evidence for a hand referent hypothesis.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Nov; 64(8):1301-15. PubMed ID: 12519027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.
    Tassinari G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Marzi CA; Berlucchi G
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(1A):55-71. PubMed ID: 3574651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Spatial compatibility effects with unimanual and bimanual wheel-rotation responses: an homage to guiard (1983).
    Murchison NM; Proctor RW
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):441-54. PubMed ID: 23972054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and coding of tactile motor events: influence of distance between stimulated and responding body parts, spatial complexity of the task and sex of subject.
    Aglioti S; Tomaiuolo F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 11011866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The Mental Timeline in a Crossed-Hands Paradigm.
    de la Vega I; Eikmeier V; Ulrich R; Kaup B
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Nov; 63(6):326-332. PubMed ID: 28059026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline.
    Nicoletti R; Anzola GP; Luppino G; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):664-73. PubMed ID: 6218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Difference in P300 response between hemi-field visual stimulation.
    Suzuki M; Hoshiyama M
    Neurol Sci; 2011 Aug; 32(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 21468682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Cerebral asymmetry in the perception of overlapping brief time intervals?
    Shekerdjiiski S; Mitrani L
    Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1984; 10(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 6741568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Effect of spatial compatibility. A tachistoscopic study on the recognition of pictures representing the right and left hand in normal subjects].
    Angelini R; Stanzione M; Orsini A; Grossi D
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1986 Jul; 62(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 3790333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space.
    Bächtold D; Baumüller M; Brugger P
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Aug; 36(8):731-5. PubMed ID: 9751438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Selective spatial attention in patients with visual extinction.
    Làdavas E
    Brain; 1990 Oct; 113 ( Pt 5)():1527-38. PubMed ID: 2245310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?
    Ladavas E; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 6232340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Stimulus-response compatibility for left-right discriminations as a function of stimulus position.
    Whitaker LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):865-74. PubMed ID: 6218236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.