These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7448496)
1. A physical assessment of the imaging performance of panel-type X-ray image intensifier. Hay GA; Cowen AR Br J Radiol; 1981 Jan; 54(637):24-8. PubMed ID: 7448496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography. Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: general overview of fluoroscopic imaging. Schueler BA Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):1115-26. PubMed ID: 10903700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality. Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Moore J; Sivananthan MU Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17115166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluoroscopic dose reduction using a digital television noise-reduction device. Ablow RC; Jaffe CC; Orphanoudakis SC; Markowitz RI; Rosenfield NS Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):313-5. PubMed ID: 6682983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector. Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Bury RF; Bruijns TJ Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11213916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Characteristics of an x-ray image intensifier that determine its suitability for roentgenoscopy]. Gurvich AM; Pereslegin IA; Rozenshtraukh LS; Shamanov AA Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1977; (6):57-63. PubMed ID: 595333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of flat-panel fluoroscopy systems: Survey of modern fluoroscopy imaging: flat-panel detectors versus image intensifiers and more. Nickoloff EL Radiographics; 2011; 31(2):591-602. PubMed ID: 21415199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory. Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective performance measurements versus perceived image quality in intensified fluoroscopic or photospot images. Gould RG; Belanger B; Goldberg HI; Moss A Radiology; 1980 Dec; 137(3):783-8. PubMed ID: 7444062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier. Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy. Gallacher DJ; Mackenzie A; Batchelor S; Lynch J; Saunders JE Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):464-72. PubMed ID: 12857706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems. Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Logarithmic amplifier for computed tomography tasks using fluoroscopic projections. Buliev I; Badea C; Pallikarakis N J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(6):247-52. PubMed ID: 12490030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]