These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7451672)

  • 1. The structure of segmental errors in the speech of deaf children.
    Levitt H; Stromberg H; Smith C; Gold T
    J Commun Disord; 1980 Dec; 13(6):419-41. PubMed ID: 7451672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech production in hearing-impaired children.
    Gold T
    J Commun Disord; 1980 Dec; 13(6):397-418. PubMed ID: 7005272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of segmental and suprasegmental corrections on the intelligibility of deaf speech.
    Maassen B; Povel DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Sep; 78(3):877-86. PubMed ID: 4031258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children.
    Smith CR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Dec; 18(4):795-811. PubMed ID: 1207108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech reading and learning to read: a comparison of 8-year-old profoundly deaf children with good and poor reading ability.
    Harris M; Moreno C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2006; 11(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 16410610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthographic structure and deaf spelling errors: syllables, letter frequency, and speech.
    Olson AC; Caramazza A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):385-417. PubMed ID: 15204133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech intelligibility of deaf speakers and distinctive feature usage.
    Mencke EO; Ochsner GJ; Testut EW
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jan; 24(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 6543865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recall in acoustically similar and dissimilar letters by normal and deaf subjects.
    Sípos I; Arochová O
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1975 Sep; 17(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 1199683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superior ultra-audiometric hearing: a new type of hearing loss which correlates highly with unusually good speech in the "profoundly deaf".
    Berlin CI; Wexler KF; Jerger JF; Halperin HR; Smith S
    Otolaryngology; 1978; 86(1):ORL-111-6. PubMed ID: 114908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A perceptual evaluation of the speech of adventitiously deaf adult males.
    Leder SB; Spitzer JB
    Ear Hear; 1990 Jun; 11(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 1967115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some aerodynamic characteristics of plosive consonants produced by hearing-impaired speakers.
    Whitehead R; Barefoot S
    Am Ann Deaf; 1980 May; 125(3):366-73. PubMed ID: 7395690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interobserver reliability using the Phonetic Level Evaluation with severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Shaw S; Coggins TE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Oct; 34(5):989-99. PubMed ID: 1749253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Obstruent production by hearing-impaired speakers: interarticulator timing and acoustics.
    McGarr NS; Löfqvist A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jul; 72(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 7108041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.
    Bond M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Elston J; Weiner G; Taylor RS; Hoyle M; Liu Z; Price A; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(44):1-330. PubMed ID: 19799825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implant--speech and language development in deaf and hard of hearing children following implantation.
    Ostojić S; Djoković S; Dimić N; Mikić B
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Apr; 68(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 21627020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Autism spectrum disorders in 24 children who are deaf or hard of hearing.
    Meinzen-Derr J; Wiley S; Bishop S; Manning-Courtney P; Choo DI; Murray D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 78(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 24290951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intelligibility of hearing impaired children as judged by their parents: A comparison between children using cochlear implants and children using hearing aids.
    Baudonck N; Dhooge I; Van Lierde K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Nov; 74(11):1310-5. PubMed ID: 20833437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Second formant transitions of selected consonant-vowel combinations in the speech of deaf and normal-hearing children.
    Monsen RB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Jun; 19(2):279-89. PubMed ID: 979202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech production changes with the use of a multichannel cochlear implant in a postlingually hearing impaired adult.
    Cummings S; Groenewald E; Hugo R; Müller L; van der Linde M
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1994; 41():3-13. PubMed ID: 8602540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.