These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of the nonstress test. Knuppel RA; Lake M; Ingram JM J Reprod Med; 1982 Mar; 27(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 7086760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome. Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonstress testing in a physician's office--a five-year experience. Hill WC; Alderson M; Henderson T West J Med; 1985 Nov; 143(5):633-5. PubMed ID: 4082570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuing role of the nonstress test in the management of postdates pregnancy. Phelan JP; Platt LD; Yeh SY; Trujillo M; Paul RH Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 6493655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Interpretation of the fetal heart rate in pregnancy and labor]. Künzel W; Hohmann M Gynakologe; 1984 Dec; 17(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 6519556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Daily antenatal cardiotocography in the management of high-risk pregnancies. Weiss DB; Pugh C; Simmons SC Int Surg; 1977 Sep; 62(9):470-5. PubMed ID: 908631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies. Cederlind CJ J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of auditory versus electronic assessment of antenatal fetal welfare. O'Leary JA; Mendenhall HW; Andrinopoulos GC Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):244-6. PubMed ID: 7393517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Monitoring of high-risk pregnancies. Complementary aspects of the nonstress test, the oxytocin test and the biophysical score]. Beco J; Lambotte R J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 3546475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of nuchal cords during nonstress testing. Simmons JN; Rufleth P; Lewis PE J Reprod Med; 1985 Feb; 30(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 3981493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to read fetal monitoring records. Young BK Prog Clin Biol Res; 1980; 44():133-49. PubMed ID: 7393930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The non-stress test. A test without stimulus for determining fetal well-being]. Vazquez Zárate VM; Villanueva Sámano LC Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1983 Aug; 51(316):213-6. PubMed ID: 6681302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Variable decelerations and the nonstress test: an indication of cord compromise. O'Leary JA; Andrinopoulos GC; Giordano PC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jul; 137(6):704-6. PubMed ID: 7395934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]