These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7453064)

  • 21. [Legal responsibility of the physician for treatment, organization and patient education errors].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):562-70. PubMed ID: 8588424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Damage to visual capacity. Recommendations of the German Ophthalmologic Society and the Workmen's Compensation Group 1994].
    Völcker HE; Gramberg-Danielsen B
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Jun; 91(3):403-7. PubMed ID: 8086762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Development of expert assessment in the malpractice lawsuit from the viewpoint of the judge].
    Franzki H
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):652-6; discussion 656-7. PubMed ID: 9064942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ["Cooperation and responsibility": the new expertise of the German Council of Health Care Advisors].
    Hausner H; Hajak G; Spiessl H
    Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Nov; 34(8):365-6. PubMed ID: 17966089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Health economic aspects of dental medicine consultation and expert assessment by the health insurance medical service].
    Seger W; Schardt W; Bücken R; Dutschek M; Schmidtke B
    Gesundheitswesen; 1995 Dec; 57(12):773-7. PubMed ID: 8580604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Expert evidence. General prerequisites and procedural characteristics for expert opinions].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Anaesthesist; 2005 Nov; 54(11):1081-8. PubMed ID: 16247639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Opinions and testimony of expert witnesses and independent medical evaluators.
    Schofferman J
    Pain Med; 2007; 8(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 17610460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The verification of the conclusions of an expert (expertise on corpses)].
    Zamiralov VS
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1997; 40(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 9198987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 374: Expert testimony.
    Committee on Ethics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):445-6. PubMed ID: 17666622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [References for expert testimony: MDK--speaking the same language with the expert witness].
    Schaupeter R
    Pflege Z; 2002 May; 55(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 12046214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Expert testimony in malpractice suits].
    Deutsch E
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 8588427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Decision of German Supreme Court on July 30, 1999 relating to scientific evidence requirements for psychological expert opinion with respect to credibility of testimony and its consequences for future expert consultation].
    Balloff R
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2000 Apr; 49(4):261-74. PubMed ID: 10850124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comments on the revision of the Königstein instructional pamphlet].
    Plath P
    HNO; 1996 Aug; 44(8):431-9. PubMed ID: 8805008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Methodology of a clinical expert conclusion in military medical expertise (Part 1)].
    Adamenko AM; Kutuzov BM; Umanskiĭ MA
    Voen Med Zh; 1991 Oct; (10):26-8. PubMed ID: 11411354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Testimony, censure and newspapers. Medical expert witness in the media].
    Engelhardt R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1996; 134(5):Oa20, Oa21. PubMed ID: 8967131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Psychiatric evaluation of patients with neurotic and somatoform disorders within the scope of legal disability pensions].
    Foerster K
    Psychiatr Prax; 1993 Jan; 20(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 8378473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.
    Gutheil TG
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Contraeditorial].
    Bordeianu CD
    Oftalmologia; 2001; 53(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11915689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Experiences during a study trip to West Germany].
    Cernák A
    Cesk Oftalmol; 1988 Feb; 44(1):58-9. PubMed ID: 3359502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.
    Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 17940854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.