These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 745364)

  • 1. Effect of contralateral noise on the middle components of the averaged electroencephalic response.
    Gutnick HN; Goldstein R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Dec; 21(4):613-24. PubMed ID: 745364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Middle components of the AER to tone-pips in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    McFarland WH; Vivion MC; Goldstein R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):781-98. PubMed ID: 604690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Middle component AERs from neonates to low-level tonal stimuli.
    Wolf KE; Goldstein R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 23(1):185-201. PubMed ID: 7442175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Maki A; Kawase T; Kobayashi T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 19550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Middle component averaged electroencephalic responses to tonal stimuli from normal neonates. Initial report.
    Wolf KE; Goldstein R
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1978 Sep; 104(9):508-13. PubMed ID: 687217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of contralateral noise on speech detection and speech reception thresholds.
    Frank T; Karlovich RS
    Audiology; 1975; 14(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 1147844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectral and level effects in noise-on-tone suppression.
    Sidwell A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1078-84. PubMed ID: 3571724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Middle-component AERs during backward masking.
    Ivey RG; Goldstein R
    J Aud Res; 1984 Oct; 24(4):279-97. PubMed ID: 6545895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: the role of temporal structure and peripheral compression.
    Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2759-70. PubMed ID: 12083211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds/ba/and/da.
    Martin BA; Sigal A; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1585-99. PubMed ID: 9069627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral and ipsilateral cueing in forward masking.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Apr; 71(4):942-5. PubMed ID: 7085981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Alcántara JI; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):103-16. PubMed ID: 12031520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of contralateral noise on the measurement of auditory threshold.
    Kawase T; Ogura M; Sato T; Kobayashi T; Suzuki Y
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2003 Jul; 200(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 14521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of interaural phase shift between a subaudible and an audible tone.
    Ayres TJ; Clack TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):411-3. PubMed ID: 6480992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quiet and masked brief-tone audiometry in subjects with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Chung DY; Smith F
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 7444319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlated individual differences in conditions used to measure psychophysical suppression and signal enhancement.
    Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3295-303. PubMed ID: 8914311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.