These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 745364)

  • 21. Forward masking by sinusoidal and noise maskers.
    Weber DL; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 May; 69(5):1402-9. PubMed ID: 7240570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of pure-tone forward masking on overshoot.
    Hicks ML; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 1880293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Toward objective analysis for electroencephalic audiometry.
    Vivion MC; Wolf KE; Goldstein R; Hirsch JE; McFarland WH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Mar; 22(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 502503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.
    Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4446. PubMed ID: 25669256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transient masking and the temporal course of simultaneous tone-on-tone masking.
    Bacon SP; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1073-7. PubMed ID: 3571723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evoked otoacoustic emission: behaviour under the forward masking paradigm.
    Kevanishvili Z; Gobsch H; Gvelesiani T; Gamgebeli Z
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 1488243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An investigation of the validity of high-frequency audition.
    Fausti SA; Rappaport BZ; Schechter MA; Frey RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):646-9. PubMed ID: 7085969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The danger of using narrow-band noise maskers to measure "suppression".
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jun; 77(6):2137-41. PubMed ID: 4019900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differences between psychophysical "suppression effects" under diotic and dichotic listening conditions.
    Yama MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Nov; 72(5):1380-3. PubMed ID: 7175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving the detectability of a brief tone in noise using forward and backward masker fringes: monotic and dichotic presentations.
    Kidd G; Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):962-7. PubMed ID: 8132910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Release from masking of low-frequency complex tones by high-frequency complex tone cue bands.
    Josupeit A; Hohmann V; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):EL450-5. PubMed ID: 23231207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Middle components of human auditory averaged electroencephalic response: waveform variations during averaging.
    Vivon MC; Goldstein R; Wolf KE; McFarland WH
    Audiology; 1977; 16(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 836251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Additivity of simultaneous masking.
    Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):262-7. PubMed ID: 6826894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of masker-frequency variability on the detection performance of infants and adults.
    Leibold LJ; Werner LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3960-70. PubMed ID: 16838539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comodulation masking release as a function of level.
    Moore BC; Shailer MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):829-35. PubMed ID: 1939887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Houtsma AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):961-5. PubMed ID: 6841822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. NoSo and NoS pi thresholds as a function of masker level for narrow-band and wideband masking noise.
    Hall JW; Harvey AD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Dec; 76(6):1699-703. PubMed ID: 6520307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of a contralateral masking stimulus on auditory response performance.
    Sagharichi M; Fulton RT
    J Aud Res; 1983 Apr; 23(2):77-93. PubMed ID: 6679550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.