These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7454413)

  • 21. Predictive value and efficiency of hematology data.
    Galen RS
    Blood Cells; 1980; 6(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 6769520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of test data from clinical studies. I. Terminology, graphic interpretation, diagnostic strategies, and selection of sample groups. II. Critical review of the concepts of efficiency, receiver operated characteristics (ROC), and likelihood ratios.
    Gerhardt W; Keller H
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1986; 181():1-74. PubMed ID: 3460162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analytical performance, reference values and decision limits. A need to differentiate between reference intervals and decision limits and to define analytical quality specifications.
    Petersen PH; Jensen EA; Brandslund I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 50(5):819-31. PubMed ID: 22628319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The normal range: a concept in transition.
    Galen RS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1977 Nov; 101(11):561-5. PubMed ID: 578695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Normal ranges and accuracy of laboratory analyses].
    Balakhovskiĭ IS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2007 Oct; (10):47-54. PubMed ID: 18154135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A plea for intra-laboratory reference limits. Part 1. General considerations and concepts for determination.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Arzideh F
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(8):1033-42. PubMed ID: 17867993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analytical quality specifications for common reference intervals.
    Ricós C; Doménech MV; Perich C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):858-62. PubMed ID: 15327023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reference interval studies: what is the maximum number of samples recommended?
    Hawkins RC; Badrick T
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 51(11):2161-5. PubMed ID: 23798619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On improving the diagnostic value of quantitative medical laboratory tests in conventional practice.
    Weldon KL; MacKay JS
    J Chronic Dis; 1972 Dec; 25(12):683-96. PubMed ID: 4648513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of laboratory error on the normal range: a Bayesian model.
    Krause RD; Anand VD; Gruemer HD; Willke TA
    Clin Chem; 1975 Mar; 21(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 1112041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Concept of reliable laboratory test procedures (author's transl)].
    Koch CD; Rommel K
    Monatsschr Kinderheilkd (1902); 1980 Mar; 128(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 6988699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nationwide multicenter study aimed at the establishment of common reference intervals for standardized clinical laboratory tests in Japan.
    Yamamoto Y; Hosogaya S; Osawa S; Ichihara K; Onuma T; Saito A; Banba K; Araki H; Nagamine Y; Shinohara K; Okada G; Matsumoto H; Oguri T; Gonaikawa S; Iwagami M;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 51(8):1663-72. PubMed ID: 23612542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability and adequacy of discharge diagnosis databases in the production of reference values.
    Kouri T; Kairisto V; Virtanen A; Uusipaikka E; Koivula T; Näntö V
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1995; 222():69-73. PubMed ID: 7569748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [New era of laboratory testing. Topics: I. Generals; 2. Setup of common reference intervals].
    Kang D
    Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Dec; 102(12):3088-95. PubMed ID: 24605555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Partitioning reference intervals by use of genetic information.
    Shirts BH; Wilson AR; Jackson BR
    Clin Chem; 2011 Mar; 57(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21164036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Understanding laboratory test results. Conditions for appropriate use of laboratory tests.
    Schwartz JS
    Med Clin North Am; 1987 Jul; 71(4):639-52. PubMed ID: 3295419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Current concepts of "normal values," "reference values," and "discrimination values," in clinical chemistry.
    Sunderman FW
    Clin Chem; 1975 Dec; 21(13):1873-7. PubMed ID: 1192578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A global multicenter study on reference values: 1. Assessment of methods for derivation and comparison of reference intervals.
    Ichihara K; Ozarda Y; Barth JH; Klee G; Qiu L; Erasmus R; Borai A; Evgina S; Ashavaid T; Khan D; Schreier L; Rolle R; Shimizu Y; Kimura S; Kawano R; Armbruster D; Mori K; Yadav BK;
    Clin Chim Acta; 2017 Apr; 467():70-82. PubMed ID: 27666761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Problems in interpreting laboratory tests. What do unexpected results mean?
    Brigden ML; Heathcote JC
    Postgrad Med; 2000 Jun; 107(7):145-6, 151-2, 155-8 passim. PubMed ID: 10887452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical and clinical norms: variations on a familiar theme.
    Munan L; Kelly A; Petitclerc C
    Clin Biochem; 1978 Jun; 11(3):75-6. PubMed ID: 688596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.