These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7456231)

  • 1. [Method of application of electrocochleography in clinical practice].
    Bogomil'skiĭ MR; Ivenskiĭ IuD; Sapozhnikov IaM
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1980; (6):25-6. PubMed ID: 7456231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Electrocochleography and measurement of brain stem auditory potentials in the diagnosis of deafness in children].
    Charachon R; Dumas G; Richard J
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1979; 100(11-12):645-55. PubMed ID: 538353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Study of the mechanism of auditory adaptation by simultaneous recording of cortical auditory evoked potentials and cochlear microphonic potentials].
    Sagalovich BM; Melkumova GG
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1981 May; 91(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 7260374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanisms of hearing: cochlear physiology.
    Neely JG
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1985 Jun; 64(6):292-307. PubMed ID: 4006808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing: travelling wave or resonance?
    Bell A
    PLoS Biol; 2004 Oct; 2(10):e337. PubMed ID: 15486577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Mechanisms of analysis and transmission in the cochlea].
    Legouix JP
    Arch Ital Biol; 1973 Dec; 111(3-4):413-21. PubMed ID: 18847040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reliability of the cochlear microphonics in clinical electrocochleography].
    Miyazaki M
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1987 Jun; 90(6):819-30. PubMed ID: 3668711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased otoacoustic-emission amplitude secondary to cochlear lesions.
    Raveh E; Mount RJ; Harrison RV
    J Otolaryngol; 1998 Dec; 27(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 9857322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Factors influencing the measurement of the distortions in cochlear microphonic potentials].
    CHOCHOLLE R; LEGOUIX JP
    J Physiol (Paris); 1956; 48(3):448-9. PubMed ID: 13346524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Changes of distortion appearing in cochlear microphonic potentials during anoxia].
    LEGOUIX JP; CHOCHOLLE R; WISNER A
    J Physiol (Paris); 1956; 48(3):605-7. PubMed ID: 13346574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The meaning of nonlinear distortions in the internal ear for acoustic and ultrasonic stimuli].
    Sagalovich BM; Malinkin VB
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1978 Jun; 64(6):737-40. PubMed ID: 680260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of stimulus attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Smit JE; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 19464523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing function in a hyperbaric environment.
    Mendel LL; Knafelc ME; Cudahy EA
    Undersea Hyperb Med; 2000; 27(2):91-105. PubMed ID: 11011799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Method of recording cochlear microphonic potentials in the cat].
    Holicska D; Kis Z
    Otorinolaringologie; 1972; 17(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 5020042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of cochlear amplification, frequency tuning, and two-tone suppression in the mouse.
    Song L; McGee J; Walsh EJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):344-55. PubMed ID: 17989242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cochlear microphonic potentials with surface electrodes in the diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss].
    De los Santos G; Sanjuán J; Gavilán J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999; 50(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 10491471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New technic for derivation of cochlear potentials of animals].
    Tereshchuk TI; Pudov AI
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1981 May; 67(5):772-5. PubMed ID: 7286313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetric cochlear processing mimics hemispheric specialization.
    Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B
    Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1581. PubMed ID: 15361617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Long-latency evoked acoustic potentials in patients with cochlear implants compared with normally hearing subjects].
    Danilkina GV; Wolberet T; Vishniakov VV; Hoppe U
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2009; (3):16-8. PubMed ID: 19692958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear microphonics for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery.
    Noguchi Y; Komatsuzaki A; Nishida H
    Laryngoscope; 1999 Dec; 109(12):1982-7. PubMed ID: 10591359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.