These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 745743)

  • 1. Radiation dose in neuroradiological procedures.
    Isherwood I; Pullan BR; Ritchings RT
    Neuroradiology; 1978; 16():477-81. PubMed ID: 745743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of lead shields in reducing radiation dosage to the eye during neuroradiological procedures.
    Dowding DV; Whall M
    Radiography; 1976 Sep; 42(501):181-4. PubMed ID: 968025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the Meditech M250 and a comparison with other CT scanners.
    Greensmith R; Richardson RB; Sargood AJ; Stevens PH; Mackintosh IP
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Nov; 58(695):1065-9. PubMed ID: 3842612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New organ-based tube current modulation method to reduce the radiation dose during computed tomography of the head: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose to the eyes in the phantom study.
    Kim JS; Kwon SM; Kim JM; Yoon SW
    Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):601-608. PubMed ID: 28341967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation dose to the eyes of the patient during neuroradiological investigations.
    Isherwood I; Young IM; Bowker KW; Bramall GK
    Neuroradiology; 1975 Dec; 10(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 1207886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study of the dose to the thyroid and the eye in computed tomography of the brain.
    Raeside DE; Anderson DW; Galloway DC
    Radiology; 1978 Dec; 129(3):814-5. PubMed ID: 725067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of head size∕shape, miscentering, and bowtie filter on peak patient tissue doses from modern brain perfusion 256-slice CT: how can we minimize the risk for deterministic effects?
    Perisinakis K; Seimenis I; Tzedakis A; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011911. PubMed ID: 23298102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Organ-based computed tomographic (CT) radiation dose reduction to the lenses: impact on image quality for CT of the head.
    Reimann AJ; Davison C; Bjarnason T; Thakur Y; Kryzmyk K; Mayo J; Nicolaou S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):334-8. PubMed ID: 22592620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
    Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Size-specific, scanner-independent organ dose estimates in contiguous axial and helical head CT examinations.
    McMillan K; Bostani M; Cagnon C; Zankl M; Sepahdari AR; McNitt-Gray M
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121909. PubMed ID: 25471969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose to critical organs of staff and patients during neuroradiology.
    Heaton B; Millard S
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Nov; 52(623):888-92. PubMed ID: 519147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phantom studies for possible dose reduction in CT head procedures.
    Staniszewska MA; Obrzut M; Rybka K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):326-31. PubMed ID: 15933131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dose and somatic risk from computed tomography.
    Faulkner K; Moores BM
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 2958068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation exposure in multidetector CT: dose comparison between late 1990s and early 2010s in Korea.
    Kim MC; Han DK; Kim YM; Lim CH; Yeon KJ; Yoon J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Oct; 156(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 23567199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Determination of adequate criteria for the comparison of dosage received during tomodensitometry and conventional neuroradiological exploration].
    Garsou J; Collard M
    J Belge Radiol; 1976; 59(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 965362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality and age-specific dose estimation in head and chest CT examinations with organ-based tube-current modulation.
    Yamauchi-Kawaura C; Yamauchi M; Imai K; Ikeda M; Aoyama T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 23734058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and global reduction of tube current for dose reduction to the eye at head CT.
    Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Grant KL; McCollough CH
    Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 22190658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study.
    Duan X; Wang J; Christner JA; Leng S; Grant KL; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 21862813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.