These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7458609)

  • 21. Biomechanical evaluation of the helica femoral implant system using traditional and modified techniques.
    Dosch M; Hayashi K; Garcia TC; Weeren R; Stover SM
    Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):867-76. PubMed ID: 23980642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The geometrical properties of human femur and tibia and their importance for the mechanical behaviour of these bone structures.
    Martens M; Van Audekercke R; De Meester P; Mulier JC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978); 1981; 98(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 7294986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bone mineral content and mechanical strength. An ex vivo study on human femora at autopsy.
    Alho A; Husby T; Høiseth A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Feb; 227():292-7. PubMed ID: 3338217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bone intrinsic material properties in three inbred mouse strains.
    Akhter MP; Fan Z; Rho JY
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Nov; 75(5):416-20. PubMed ID: 15592798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Material changes in osteoporotic human cancellous bone following infiltration with acrylic bone cement for a vertebral cement augmentation.
    Baroud G; Nemes J; Ferguson SJ; Steffen T
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Apr; 6(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 12745427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A critical review of the biomechanical stress analysis of the human femur.
    Gdoutos EE; Raftopoulos DD; Baril JD
    Biomaterials; 1982 Jan; 3(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 7039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Compressive properties of trabecular bone in the distal femur.
    Burgers TA; Mason J; Niebur G; Ploeg HL
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(5):1077-85. PubMed ID: 18206893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Structural parameters and mechanical strength of cancellous bone in the femoral head in osteoarthritis do not depend on age.
    Perilli E; Baleani M; Ohman C; Baruffaldi F; Viceconti M
    Bone; 2007 Nov; 41(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 17707709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties.
    Majumdar S; Kothari M; Augat P; Newitt DC; Link TM; Lin JC; Lang T; Lu Y; Genant HK
    Bone; 1998 May; 22(5):445-54. PubMed ID: 9600777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changed morphology and mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the mandibular condyles of edentate people.
    Giesen EB; Ding M; Dalstra M; van Eijden TM
    J Dent Res; 2004 Mar; 83(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 14981130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical evaluation of screw-in femoral implant in cementless total hip system.
    Kim JY; Hayashi K; Garcia TC; Kim SY; Entwistle R; Kapatkin AS; Stover SM
    Vet Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 22092256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mechanical properties of femoral trabecular bone in dogs.
    Pressel T; Bouguecha A; Vogt U; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Behrens BA; Nolte I; Windhagen H
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Mar; 4():17. PubMed ID: 15774014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of osteoporosis on the compressive properties of femoral cancellous bone and its dependence on various density parameters.
    Metzner F; Neupetsch C; Fischer JP; Drossel WG; Heyde CE; Schleifenbaum S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13284. PubMed ID: 34168240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of tensile-compressive loading mode and microarchitecture on microdamage in human vertebral cancellous bone.
    Lambers FM; Bouman AR; Tkachenko EV; Keaveny TM; Hernandez CJ
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(15):3605-12. PubMed ID: 25458150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anisotropy of osteoporotic cancellous bone.
    Sugita H; Oka M; Toguchida J; Nakamura T; Ueo T; Hayami T
    Bone; 1999 May; 24(5):513-6. PubMed ID: 10321912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cancellous bone and mechanical strength of the femoral neck.
    Delaere O; Dhem A; Bourgois R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1989; 108(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 2923534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone.
    Keller TS
    J Biomech; 1994 Sep; 27(9):1159-68. PubMed ID: 7929465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses.
    Baca V; Horak Z; Mikulenka P; Dzupa V
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Sep; 30(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 18243761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of the fixation technique on the mechanical properties of human cancellous bone of the femoral head.
    Fischer B; Hofmann A; Kurz S; Edel M; Zajonz DJ; Roth A; Schleifenbaum S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Feb; 82():105280. PubMed ID: 33582564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pullout strength of cancellous screws in human femoral heads depends on applied insertion torque, trabecular bone microarchitecture and areal bone mineral density.
    Ab-Lazid R; Perilli E; Ryan MK; Costi JJ; Reynolds KJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Dec; 40():354-361. PubMed ID: 25265033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.