These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7458753)

  • 21. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High frequency Bekesy audiometry. I: equipment and calibration.
    Gauz MT; Brey RH; Ahroon WA
    J Aud Res; 1980 Oct; 20(4):279-94. PubMed ID: 7349307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Audiometric instrumentation: equipment choices, techniques.
    Morrill JC
    Occup Health Saf; 1984; 53(10):78-84. PubMed ID: 6549600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A computer-based test system for implementing pure-tone audiometry, acoustic immittance and tympanic membrane displacement measurements.
    Marchbanks RJ; Martin AM
    Br J Audiol; 1985 Feb; 19(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 3839147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of a Tablet Audiometer for Measuring Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Clinical Population.
    Thompson GP; Sladen DP; Borst BJ; Still OL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Nov; 153(5):838-42. PubMed ID: 26183518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [An automated tracking audiometer].
    Bouchet P; Pernier J; Gerin P; Morgon A; Ubersfeld A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1983 May; 21(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 6876912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microcomputer-controlled psychoacoustics in clinical audiology.
    Lutman ME
    Br J Audiol; 1983 May; 17(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 6688744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of speech audiometry and pure tone audiometry in patients with secretory otitis media.
    Pringle MB; Thompson A; Reddy K
    J Laryngol Otol; 1993 Sep; 107(9):787-9. PubMed ID: 8228591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Development of computerized automatic pure-tone and speech audiometer (author's transl)].
    Sakabe N
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1978 Oct; 16(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 739646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Advantages with a new Bekesy audiometer in the measurement of noise induced hearing loss.
    Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):265-72. PubMed ID: 6939097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones.
    Yeung JC; Heley S; Beauregard Y; Champagne S; Bromwich MA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1248-52. PubMed ID: 26055197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The instructional effectiveness of a web-based audiometry simulator.
    Lieberth AK; Martin DR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Feb; 16(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 15807047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Audiometric characteristics of a Dutch family with Muckle-Wells syndrome.
    Weegerink NJ; Schraders M; Leijendeckers J; Slieker K; Huygen PL; Hoefsloot L; Oostrik J; Pennings RJ; Simon A; Snik A; Kremer H; Kunst HP
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):243-51. PubMed ID: 21810457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modernising speech audiometry: using a smartphone application to test word recognition.
    van Zyl M; Swanepoel W; Myburgh HC
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):561-569. PubMed ID: 29676598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Suitability of the middle acoustic evoked potential P35 for frequency-specific measurements].
    Brusis T; Bockisch A
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Dec; 64(12):631-7. PubMed ID: 4087995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preoperative speech and pure-tone audiometry in four types of patients with acoustic neuroma.
    Morlet T; Dubreuil C; Duclaux R; Ferber-Viart C
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2003; 24(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 13130441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reference equivalent threshold levels for pure tones and 1/3-oct noise bands: insert earphone and TDH-49 earphone.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 3950196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hearing deterioration in patients with a non-growing vestibular schwannoma.
    Graamans K; Van Dijk JE; Janssen LW
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 12625573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.