These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 745877)

  • 1. Subjective estimates of body tilt and the rod-and-frame test.
    Sigman E; Goodenough DR; Flannagan M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 2):1051-6. PubMed ID: 745877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Young children's Rod-and-Frame Test performance.
    Haywood K; Teeple J; Givens M; Patterson J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 905075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An entry in the great frame-tilt judging contest.
    Goodenough DR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Feb; 52(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 7232097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Respective contribution of orientation contrast and illusion of self-tilt to the rod-and-frame effect.
    Cian C; Esquivié D; Barraud PA; Raphel C
    Perception; 1995; 24(6):623-30. PubMed ID: 7478903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of geometrical structure on perception of the vertical in the Rod-and-Frame Test.
    Nybrog H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Apr; 44(2):583-9. PubMed ID: 866066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scoring rod-and-frame tests: quantitative and qualitative considerations.
    Haller O; Edgington ES
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Oct; 55(2):587-93. PubMed ID: 6897563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frame-of-reference and hierarchical-organisation effects in the rod-and-frame illusion.
    Zoccolotti P; Antonucci G; Daini R; Martelli ML; Spinelli D
    Perception; 1997; 26(12):1485-94. PubMed ID: 9616476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex differences in feedback: effects on Rod-and-Frame performance.
    Erdos G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1279-85. PubMed ID: 492901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Field-dependence, extraversion and perception of the vertical: empirical and theoretical perspectives of the rod-and-frame test.
    Fine BJ; Danforth AV
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Jun; 40(3):683-93. PubMed ID: 1178347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential effects of the rod-and-frame illusion on the timing of forearm rotations.
    Lommertzen J; van Zuijlen AM; Meulenbroek RG; van Lier R
    Motor Control; 2009 Jan; 13(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 19246778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Field-dependence/independence: ability in relation to mobility-fixity.
    Hansson SB; Rydén OO; Johnsson P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Aug; 63(1):279-93. PubMed ID: 3748740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orientation bias in the Rod-and-Frame Test.
    Pitblado C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):891-900. PubMed ID: 876799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The gap between rod and frame influences the rod-and-frame effect with small and large inducing displays.
    Zoccolotti P; Antonucci G; Spinelli D
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8351184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of the visual horizontal during lateral body tilt: right-left asymmetries.
    Bauermeister M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 1):715-20. PubMed ID: 740463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived self-orientation in allocentric and egocentric space: effects of visual and physical tilt on saccadic and tactile measures.
    Barnett-Cowan M; Harris LR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():231-43. PubMed ID: 18706895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective postural orientation and visual vertical during slow pitch tilt for the seated human subject.
    Ito Y; Gresty MA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1997 Jan; 68(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 9006875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posture, acceptability and energy consumption on a tiltable and a knee-support chair.
    Bendix A; Jensen CV; Bendix T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1988 May; 3(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23915836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field dependence and body balance.
    Kitamura F; Matsunaga K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Dec; 71(3 Pt 1):723-34. PubMed ID: 2293175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation of eye movements to errors on the Rod-and-Frame Test.
    Blowers GH; O'Connor KP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Jun; 46(3 Pt 1):719-25. PubMed ID: 673627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of the vertical with a head-mounted visual frame during head tilt.
    Mars F; Vercher JL; Blouin J
    Ergonomics; 2004 Aug; 47(10):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15370867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.