These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7461613)
1. Law & Psychiatry. Appelbaum PS Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1981 Jan; 32(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 7461613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patients, therapists, and third parties: the victimological virtues of Tarasoff. Wexler DB Int J Law Psychiatry; 1979; 2(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 489186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tarasoff: protective privilege versus public peril. Gurevitz H Am J Psychiatry; 1977 Mar; 134(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 842706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tarasoff and the practice of psychotherapy. Goldstein RL Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Aug; 150(8):1278-9. PubMed ID: 8328592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tarasoff and the clinician: problems in fulfilling the duty to protect. Appelbaum PS Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Apr; 142(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 3976915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tarasoff at twenty-five. Herbert PB; Young KA J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 12108565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 1 Jul 1976. California. Supreme Court, In Bank Wests Calif Report; 1976; 131():14-42. PubMed ID: 11646056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Untangling Tarasoff: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. Seligman BS Hastings Law J; 1977 Sep; 29(1):179-210. PubMed ID: 11661581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapists, policemen and the duty to warn--an unreasonable extension of the common law? Kaplan RB Gold Gate Law Rev; 1975; 6(1):229-48. PubMed ID: 11661331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal issues in medical management of violent and threatening patients. Dickens BM Can J Psychiatry; 1986 Nov; 31(8):772-80. PubMed ID: 3791135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 23 Dec 1974. California. Supreme Court Wests Calif Report; 1974; 118():129-45. PubMed ID: 11645905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: the duty to warn--common law and statutory problems for California psychotherapists. Cohen RN Calif West Law Rev; 1978; 14(1):153-82. PubMed ID: 11664959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's. Perlin ML Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Vermont adopts Tarasoff: a real barn-burner. Stone AA Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Mar; 143(3):352-5. PubMed ID: 3953871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Where the public peril begins". 25 years after Tarasoff. Buckner F; Firestone M J Leg Med; 2000 Jun; 21(2):187-222. PubMed ID: 10911695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. McIntosh v. Milano. 12 Jun 1979. New Jersey. Superior Court, Law Division Atl Report; 1979; 403():500-15. PubMed ID: 11645934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing dangerousness and responding appropriately: Hedlund expands the clinician's liability established by Tarasoff. Gross BH; Southard MJ; Lamb HR; Weinberger LE J Clin Psychiatry; 1987 Jan; 48(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 3804989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. California survey examines impact of Tarasoff decision. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1979; 3(3):201-2. PubMed ID: 11665066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]