These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7461954)
1. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles. Noonan JT Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion 1980: the debate continues. Healey JM Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court, abortion policy, and state response: a preliminary analysis. Nicholson JB; Steward DW Publius; 1978; 8(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11664024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court and abortion: 2. Sidestepping social realities. Mechanic D Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 7007284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Paying for abortion: is the Court wrong? Shinn Re Christ Crisis; 1977 Sep; 37(14):202-7. PubMed ID: 11663787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion. Mahoney HM America (NY); 1993 Oct; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Supreme Court and abortion: the irrelevance of medical judgment. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Oct; 10(5):23-4. PubMed ID: 7002867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The abortion arena: recent activity. Goldstein LS; Comeau DJ Leg Med; 1982; ():213-26. PubMed ID: 7121180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral. Hirt TC Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion). Sunstein CR Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools. McConnell MW Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Barnett BA Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues. Yarbrough TE North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion as a vice crime: a "what if" story. Kaplan J Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(1):151-79. PubMed ID: 11650281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]