These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7462041)

  • 1. [Transmission of speech sounds by hearing aids (author's transl)].
    Welzl-Müller K
    HNO; 1980; 28(9):313-6. PubMed ID: 7462041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Speech discrimination and dynamic compression. A comparative study with hearing aids (author's transl)].
    Welleschik B; Wicke W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Jul; 56(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 142877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
    Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Responsible use of modern hearing aid technology. III: Improved speech discrimination in noise. Modern hearing aid technology in pediatric management].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 1997 May; 45(5):403-14. PubMed ID: 9265027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
    Fabry DA; Leek MR; Walden BE; Cord M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Masking of tinnitus aurium by maskers and hearing aids (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J
    HNO; 1980 Nov; 28(11):383-8. PubMed ID: 7462028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved white noise method in the evaluation of linear hearing-aids characteristics.
    Granados P; Aljama T; Cadena M; Cornejo JM
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):37-42. PubMed ID: 7968863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rehabilitation plasticity: influence of hearing aid fitting on frequency discrimination performance near the hearing-loss cut-off.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 16459036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fricatives, affricates, and vowels in Croatian children with cochlear implants.
    Mildner V; Liker M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(10-11):845-56. PubMed ID: 18608242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tolerable hearing aid delays. III. Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 12677113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The usefulness of today's hearing aids--possibilities and limitations].
    Kiessling J
    MMW Fortschr Med; 1999 Jun; 141(24):32-4. PubMed ID: 10468490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.