These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7462458)

  • 1. Relation between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. I.
    Dreschler WA; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1608-15. PubMed ID: 7462458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pure tone audiograms from hearing-impaired children. II. Predicting speech-hearing from the audiogram.
    Bamford JM; Wilson IM; Atkinson D; Bench J
    Br J Audiol; 1981 Feb; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7214068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Room acoustics for the aged.
    Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1616-21. PubMed ID: 7462459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating the acoustics of running speech into the pure tone audiogram: a step from audibility to intelligibility and disability.
    Corthals P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18057908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of input-output configuration in syllabic compression on speech perception.
    Maré MJ; Dreschler WA; Verschuure H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):675-85. PubMed ID: 1608260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise.
    Smits C; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22087927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age Dependence of Thresholds for Speech in Noise in Normal-Hearing Adolescents.
    Jacobi I; Sheikh Rashid M; de Laat JAPM; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517743641. PubMed ID: 29212433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Danish hearing in noise test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram.
    Middelweerd MJ; Festen JM; Plomp R
    Audiology; 1990; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2310349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region.
    Noordhoek IM; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1197-212. PubMed ID: 11303933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II.
    Dreschler WA; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1261-70. PubMed ID: 4056220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of channel bandwidth on consonant and vowel identification by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Li N; Rodriguez J; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1598-606. PubMed ID: 23464029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.
    Nilsson M; Soli SD; Sullivan JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1085-99. PubMed ID: 8132902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.