These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7464421)

  • 21. Performance appraisal, 1: Risks and rewards.
    Romberg RV
    Personnel; 1986 Aug; 63(8):20-6. PubMed ID: 10278732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Getting the most out of performance appraisals.
    Gubman EL
    Manage Rev; 1984 Nov; 73(11):44-8. PubMed ID: 10269466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance review guidelines revisited.
    Zielski K
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Feb; 37(2):76-7. PubMed ID: 10315281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How accurate are performance appraisals?
    Winstanley NB
    Pers Adm; 1980 Aug; 25(8):55-8. PubMed ID: 10248160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Health care manager's notebook: performance appraisals.
    Hengesbach J; Buschmohle MJ
    Hosp Forum; 1981; 24(6):45-8. PubMed ID: 10253069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance appraisal, 2: Improving the rater's effectiveness.
    Martin DC
    Personnel; 1986 Aug; 63(8):28-33. PubMed ID: 10278733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Telling subordinates what to do and how to do it.
    English JW; Gottesman JI
    Superv Manage; 1979 Jul; 24(7):21-4. PubMed ID: 10242789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of performance standards on productivity among medical record department employees.
    Stich EK
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Aug; 61(8):44-8. PubMed ID: 10105672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Staff development. Appraisals reassessed.
    Watson J
    Health Soc Serv J; 1984 Jun; 94(4901):708. PubMed ID: 10267770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Managing the performance evaluation system: a case study.
    Tanner S; Greene L
    Health Care Superv; 1986 Jan; 4(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 10274986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changing management positions.
    Seville CM
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1985 Aug; 7(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 10272344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Developing criteria for promotion and tenure.
    Garrity M; Miller V; Osborn M; Vanderlinden M
    Nurs Outlook; 1980 Mar; 28(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 6899063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Community health nurses. An evaluation test].
    Wiacek M
    Pieleg Polozna; 1985; (1):9-10. PubMed ID: 3846303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance standards for the transfusion service.
    Bachert LB
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1987 Nov; 19(11):33-9. PubMed ID: 10287246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rx for medical control.
    Latessa EM
    JEMS; 1984 Apr; 9(4):39-41. PubMed ID: 10265868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A checklist for evaluating administrators.
    Hosp Trustee; 1978; 2(5):5-8. PubMed ID: 10239699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Standards of performance in central service. A key to a quality assurance program.
    Martin NS
    Hosp Top; 1984; 62(5):34-43. PubMed ID: 10267865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Appraisal schemes could do better.
    Watson J
    Health Soc Serv J; 1983 Oct; 93(4870):1288-9. PubMed ID: 10263806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Management tools for the modern day health administrator. Part 5. Setting standards and motivating tools.
    Snook ID; Zimmerman GM
    Hosp Top; 1984; 62(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 10264678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Establishing objective performance standards.
    Olson TR
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):54-61. PubMed ID: 10263570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.