These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7465117)
21. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal. Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cytologic, vascular, and histologic patterns of dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and early invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Johannisson E; Kolstad P; Söderberg G Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1966; ():Suppl 258:1+. PubMed ID: 5964746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Colposcopy. Odell LD; Savage EW Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1974; 3(0):473-507. PubMed ID: 4608866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The abnormal Pap smear--what to do next? Creasman WT; Clarke-Pearson DL; Ashe C; Weed JC Cancer; 1981 Jul; 48(2 Suppl):515-22. PubMed ID: 7272976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush. Partoll LM; Javaheri G Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Intraepithelial cervical lesions: colpo-microcolposcopic diagnosis]. Pace S; Labi GL; Figliolini M; Stentella P; De Falco V; Mastrone M; Villani C; Lotti G Minerva Ginecol; 1993; 45(1-2):9-11. PubMed ID: 8469368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of speculoscopy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears. Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy. Massad LS; Lonky NM; Mutch DG; Mann WJ; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8387595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Can colposcopy replace conization? Townsend DE; Richart RM CA Cancer J Clin; 1982; 32(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 6800593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population. Chin AB; Bristow RE; Korst LM; Walts A; Lagasse LD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10871439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report. Luesley D; Downey G J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the abnormal PAP smear - colposcopy or conization? Powell JL J Med Assoc Ga; 1980 May; 69(5):399-402. PubMed ID: 7373179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cytologic correlation between the Bethesda system and colposcopic biopsy]. González Sánchez JL; Pérez Guerrero C; Celorio Aguilera G; Chávez Barambila J; Ríos Montiel FA Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1998 Aug; 66():330-4. PubMed ID: 9745194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The making of a colposcopist. A safe and sensible approach. Feldman MJ; Kent DR; Linzey EM; Goldstein AI J Reprod Med; 1976 Feb; 16(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1255646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]