These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Analysis of evoked potentials in man during discrimination of complex patterns. Zelenkova TP; Ivanitskii AM Hum Physiol; 1979; 5(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 548440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dependence of recognition time of meaningful photic stimuli on spatiotemporal organization of brain potentials. Potulova LA; Vasil'ev YaA Hum Physiol; 1983; 9(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 6678789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Checkerboard-evoked potentials: topography and latency for onset, offset, and reversal. Skrandies W; Richter M; Lehmann D Prog Brain Res; 1980; 54():291-5. PubMed ID: 7220928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-recognition as a test of consciousness in left and right hemisphere of "split-brain" patients. Preilowski B Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1977 Jul; 19 Suppl 2():343-4. PubMed ID: 551649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Binocularly evoked potentials: slow, late components to random-dot stereograms and correlograms (dynamic Julesz patterns). Lehmann D; Skrandies W; Lindenmaier C Prog Brain Res; 1980; 54():286-90. PubMed ID: 7220927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemispheric asymmetries in a letter classification task with different typefaces. Umiltà C; Sava D; Salmaso D Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 7363062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Critical frequency of photic driving in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A comparison to pattern evoked responses. Cohen SN; Syndulko K; Tourtellotte WW; Potvin AR Arch Neurol; 1980 Feb; 37(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 7356412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of cerebral lateralization of function using EEG alpha-contingent visual stimulation II. Goodman D; Mulholland T Int J Psychophysiol; 1988 Nov; 6(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 3225202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Electrophysiologic analysis of interhemispheric differences in mechanisms of visual recognition]. Beteleva TG; Farber DA Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1984; 34(5):841-7. PubMed ID: 6506862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the pattern and diffuse-light visual evoked responses in definite multiple sclerosis. Wilson WB; Keyser RB Arch Neurol; 1980 Jan; 37(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 7350898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The pattern-evoked potential in lesions of the posterior visual pathways. Blumhardt LD; Barrett G; Kriss A; Halliday AM Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():264-89. PubMed ID: 6953872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in components of the event-related potential (ERP) during visual recognition: effects of stimulus degradation and stimulus familiarity. Kok A Prog Brain Res; 1980; 54():640-6. PubMed ID: 7220979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward a functional categorization of slow waves. Ruchkin DS; Johnson R; Mahaffey D; Sutton S Psychophysiology; 1988 May; 25(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 3406333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]