155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7466283)
1. The difference in protection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigation performed at a workplace.
Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 7466283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in efficiency of earplugs and earmuffs measured as hearing impairments from two workshops.
Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):194-9. PubMed ID: 6939088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The acoustical attenuation of some combinations of earplugs and earmuffs.
Rawlinson RD; Wheeler PD; Custard G
Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 3426030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
Suter AH; Lempert BL; Franks JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2114-7. PubMed ID: 2348018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry.
Chung DY; Hardie R; Gannon RP
J Occup Med; 1983 Sep; 25(9):679-82. PubMed ID: 6631567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
Abel SM; Odell P
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of industrial use on the acoustical performance of some earmuffs.
Rawlinson RD; Wheeler PD
Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 3426029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of earplugs in high-intensity impulse noise.
Dancer A; Grateau P; Cabanis A; Barnabé G; Cagnin G; Vaillant T; Lafont D
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1677-89. PubMed ID: 1564203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficiency of ear protectors in laboratory and real life tests.
Pawlas K; Grzesik J
Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1990; 62(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2379964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal detection in industrial noise: effects of noise exposure history, hearing loss, and the use of ear protection.
Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 4059854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by pure-tone audiometry and by Békésy sweep audiometry.
Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():54-5. PubMed ID: 287352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of hearing protection on sound localization and orienting behavior.
Simpson BD; Bolia RS; McKinley RL; Brungart DS
Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 15960096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
Alberti PW; Riko K
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing protective devices.
Abel SM
Can J Public Health; 1986; 77 Suppl 1():104-7. PubMed ID: 3742410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part I: Review of previous work and the design of an improved test fixture.
Schroeter J
J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1065-81. PubMed ID: 3700862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise attenuation of earplugs as measured by hREAT and F-MIRE methods in a Japanese metal manufacturing plant.
Kabe I; Kochi T; Tsuruoka H; Tonegawa T; Denda I; Nonogi M; Tsuiki H; Mizoue T; Tanaka S
J Occup Health; 2012; 54(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 22673642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
